Latest Breaking News On - போது தி பென்சில்வேனியா உச்ச நீதிமன்றம் - Page 1 : comparemela.com

To embed, copy and paste the code into your website or blog: My colleagues and I have written much recently regarding governmental antitrust authorities’ review of no-poach conduct (for example, see here). But let us not forget the additional scrutiny such agreements can face in commercial litigation. A recent Pennsylvania Supreme Court case considered, for the first time in that state, whether such provisions are enforceable under Pennsylvania law when they are ancillary to a services contract between two businesses. See Pittsburgh Logistics Sys., Inc. v. Beemac Trucking, LLC., No. 31 WAP 2019, 2021 WL 1676399 (Pa. Apr. 29, 2021). The case was brought by Pittsburgh Logistics Systems, Inc. (“PLS”), described as a logistics provider that arranged for the shipping of its customers’ freight with selected companies, against Beemac Trucking, LLC (“Beemac”), one of those selected companies. The Services Contract between the two companies apparently contained a one-year, no

United statesPittsburgh logistics systems incDepartment of justiceBeemac truckingServices contractWhile the pennsylvania supreme courtPittsburgh logistics systemsPennsylvania supreme courtஒன்றுபட்டது மாநிலங்களில்பிட்ஸ்பர்க் தளவாடங்கள் அமைப்புகள் இன்க்துறை ஆஃப் நீதிசேவைகள் ஒப்பந்தபோது தி பென்சில்வேனியா உச்ச நீதிமன்றம்பிட்ஸ்பர்க் தளவாடங்கள் அமைப்புகள்பென்சில்வேனியா உச்ச நீதிமன்றம்