Joe Fleming, et al. v. U.S. Department of Agriculture
/EIN News/ Washington, D.C., April 01, 2021 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) A two-judge majority of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit erred in
Fleming v. USDA in February when it refused to address the constitutionality of the multiple layers of for-cause removal protection enjoyed by administrative law judges (ALJs) at the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). The court remanded the issue back to USDA for initial consideration by the very ALJ whose constitutional status is under challenge. That remand not only failed to resolve the structural constitutional problem inherent in the statute but generated a second issue: whether USDA’s permissive claim-processing rules themselves bind Article III courts.
NCLA Seeks D C Cir Rehearing to Urge Jurisdiction over Constitutional Claim Against USDA ALJs
apnews.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from apnews.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
Constitutional Problems With the Kentucky Proposal (Supported by Mitch McConnell) to Change the Way U S Senate Vacancies Are Filled
justia.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from justia.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.