[co-author: Jennifer Dickson, Land Use Planner]
The New York City Department of City Planning (DCP) has scheduled a public scoping meeting for Friday January 22, 2021 for the
Citywide Hotel Text Amendment. The Citywide Hotel Text Amendment seeks to establish a new City Planning Commission special permit for new and enlarged transient hotels, motels, tourist cabins, and boatels in districts where such uses are currently allowed as-of-right, including C1, C2, C4, C5, C6, C8, Mixed-Use (MX), and paired M1/R districts. The new hotel special permit would require new hotels and other transient uses to go through ULURP, the city’s land use review process. The proposed text amendment would retain existing regulations for hotels in M1 districts where a special permit was previously adopted in December 2018. The draft scoping materials state that DCP is also evaluating changes to the Zoning Resolution’s discontinuance provisions for existing commercial hotels in all zoning districts c
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.
The New York City Department of City Planning (DCP) has
scheduled a public scoping meeting for Friday January 22,
2021 for the
Citywide Hotel
Text Amendment. The Citywide Hotel Text Amendment
seeks to establish a new City Planning Commission special permit
for new and enlarged transient hotels, motels, tourist cabins, and
boatels in districts where such uses are currently allowed
as-of-right, including C1, C2, C4, C5, C6, C8, Mixed-Use (MX), and
paired M1/R districts. The new hotel special permit would
require new hotels and other transient uses to go through ULURP,
Legal Disclaimer
You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review s (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC s Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.