தெர்றள் நதி சேவை News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

It is not often that a federal district court limits an expert witness’ s proffered testimony on the ground that the expert is not qualified to offer it, and it is also uncommon for a court to exclude expert testimony on the ground that it would not assist the trier of fact. However, the Western District of Louisiana recently limited a proffered engineering expert’s testimony on both of those grounds. In Terral River Service, Inc. v. SCF Marine, Inc., No. 3:19-CV-00406, Plaintiff purchased a barge from Defendant and later found it partially submerged due to a fracture in the bow. The parties disputed the timing of the fracture, with Plaintiff alleging that it existed prior to delivery of the barge. Plaintiff offered as an expert witness a metallurgical and mechanical engineer with experience in evaluating barge fractures.

United statesTerral river service incMarine incFaegre drinker biddle reathFaegre drinker biddleWestern districtTerral river serviceFederal ruleஒன்றுபட்டது மாநிலங்களில்தெர்றள் நதி சேவை இன்க்கடல் இன்க்மேற்கு மாவட்டம்தெர்றள் நதி சேவைகூட்டாட்சியின் ஆட்சி