comparemela.com

Latest Breaking News On - திருத்தம் அடித்தளம் - Page 1 : comparemela.com

It is remarkable how many blatant falsehoods are propagated about qualified immunity – Mackinac Center

Durant-Related Payments Durant-related payments refer to state expenditures that resulted from the Michigan Supreme Court’s 1997 decision in Durant v. State of Michigan. The court held that state government had mandated certain special education programs, but failed to finance adequately districts’ compliance with these mandates, thereby violating the Headlee amendment to the Michigan Constitution. As a settlement, the court awarded $212 million in damages to the school districts that had joined in the lawsuit (for more on Durant and related court decisions, see “Appendix 2: Summary of ‘Durant’ Court Decisions”). A number of school districts, however, did not join the Durant v. State of Michigan lawsuit. These “nonplaintiff” districts receive two forms of payment in return for forgoing any legal claims related to the Durant decision.[clxix] We discuss both payments below.

Eagle River lawmaker proposes that Alaska ignore some federal laws and orders

Eagle River lawmaker proposes that Alaska ignore some federal laws and orders Published 4 hours ago Share on Facebook Print article JUNEAU A state senator, opposed to a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention order on aircraft and public transportation, has asked the Alaska Legislature to consider ignoring certain federal laws, regulations and executive orders. The idea is one of many similar ideas advancing in Republican-controlled statehouses across the country despite opponents who say the concept blatantly violates the U.S. Constitution. If approved by the Senate, House and Gov. Mike Dunleavy, Senate Bill 118 would create a legislative “Committee on Nullification of Federal Laws.” If the committee recommends that a federal rule be ignored and both the House and Senate agree, “the state and the citizens of the state may not recognize or be obligated to abide by the federal law or executive order.”

Poll: 72% of Voters Support the Second Amendment

Poll: 72% of Voters Support the Second Amendment 15 Apr 2021 A McLaughlin & Associates poll conducted April 8-13, 2021, shows 72 percent of general election voters support the Second Amendment and its protections on the right to keep and bear arms. Moreover, the poll found 73.4 percent of general election voters agreed that “the Founders understood the importance of law-abiding citizens right to legally own firearms for things like hunting, sport and personal protection.” The 73.4 percent also agreed that “the 2nd Amendment is one of our most important and cherished civil rights in the U.S. Constitution.” By a margin of 58.1 percent to 21.9 percent, general election voters said they were more likely to support a candidate “who supports the Second Amendment and the right to bear arms.”

© 2025 Vimarsana

vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.