Tishman Speyer signed Ipsos to a 58K SF lease at The Franklin in Chicago’s West Loop. It’s another sign the downtown office market is showing some signs of life after more than a year in hibernation.
The 2.5M SF Franklin consists of two connected buildings at 222 West Adams St. and 227 West Monroe St. Ipsos will occupy the 11th floor, which spans the two towers, in May 2022. The market research company will relocate from 222 South Riverside. The Franklin
The Franklin complex features a number of amenities that Ipsos leaders said will ease employees’ return to the office. These include the café Rustle + Roux, a shared workspace called Studio, a 300-person conference center, and full bar and event venue R29.
Maywood-park
Illinois
United-states
Langley
Melrose-park
Chicago-loop
Crystal-lake
Texas
Indiana
Rosewood
Deerfield
Dallas
Letter: Vaccine letter doesn t square with the facts
The following is a letter to the editor submitted to the newspaper by a reader. It does not necessarily reflect the views of the Echo Press. To submit a letter, send it to aedenloff@echopress.com or Echo Press, P.O. Box 549, Alexandria, MN 56308. 10:05 am, May 14, 2021
To the editor:
(In response to Jill Brown’s May 7 letter, “Why give an experimental vaccine to children?”)
One of the dangers of our “tribal” society is that we refuse to believe “facts we don’t want to see.” For example, if I get my news primarily from one source, and my neighbors get their news from a different network, our perceptions of the truth are often distorted.
United-states
America
Dirk-sostman
Jonathan-zimmerman
Houston-methodist-medical-college
University-of-pennsylvania
Jill-brown
Sherry-tenpenny
Simone-gold
ஒன்றுபட்டது-மாநிலங்களில்
அமெரிக்கா
ஜொனாதன்-ஸிம்மர்மந்
Readers Write: Police and white supremacist affiliation, crowd-control chemicals, police deaths, wokeness Beware this seeming solution. Text size Copy shortlink:
I am concerned with the push to prohibit police officers from affiliating with white supremacist groups. While it is easy to agree with the thought behind this proposal, the devil is in the details.
First and foremost is, who will decide what a white supremacist group is? While there are groups most people and political factions would probably agree on, it is disingenuous to claim such a label will be easy to apply in all cases. What about groups that claim to be religious organizations? Can we ban a person from being a police officer because of their religion? Can we ban people because they are members of a legal political party that espouses views that some, or even most, people find repugnant? Will the definitions change every time political power changes hands?
United-states
Minnesota
Germany
New-york
Mendota-heights
China
Italy
Waconia
North-korea
Kansas
Hennepin-county
Russia