Latest Breaking News On - சூரனா நிறுவனம் - Page 6 : comparemela.com

In September 2013, the CBI registered another case, saying that while the seized gold was not wanted in the 2012 cases, it had found that Surana had imported the same in violation of the Foreign Trade Policy. The CBI hence requested that the seized gold be transferred from the first case to the fresh one following which the court allowed the transfer of about 400 kg on record. “There was no physical inventorisation by the court” as the gold was already in the vault. Subsequently, in 2015, the CBI filed a closure report in the second case stating that “there is no adequate evidence forthcoming”. The CBI Special Court accepted the same but directed that the seized gold be handed over to the Directorate General of Foreign Trade (DGFT). This order was later set aside by the Madras High Court on Surana’s petition.

Tamil naduUnited statesOmar sharifNational investigation agencyMetals trading corporation of indiaMadras high court on suranaMinistry of commerceNational company law tribunalMadras high courtSurana corporationTamil nadu policeArun janardhananRepresentational imageMadras high court fridayPublic prosecutorJudge pn prakash