AP Photo/Ringo H.W. Chiu
In the deepening of the already cozy relationship between President Joe Biden and Big Labor, Fox News reports on waivers given to certain Biden administration appointees who had prior Union ties:
The Biden administration has come under scrutiny from Republicans on Capitol Hill following its decision to circumvent federal ethics rules and staff former union officials in senior posts.
Beginning as early as March, the White House waived certain rules for former labor union personnel slotted to fill Biden’s transition teams and government vacancies, who would have otherwise been prevented from communicating with their old unions.
What Is The Science Behind These Lockdowns?
Lockdowns and waiting for vaccine distribution is not a plan for responsible government. There needs to be accountability to the decisions that are being made that affect small businesses.” Edward HenryTORONTO, ONTARIO, CANADA, March 4, 2021 /EINPresswire.com/ Lockdown restrictions and decisions have been made without consideration of all the facts and only on what seems to be the main function of the business. What is the science behind the restrictions set in the colour-coded zones? How do you qualify as an essential and non-essential business? The decision to close businesses should be based on protecting employees and consumers, not solely on what their industry activity is. Businesses cannot continue to be placed in lockdown based on unfair qualifications.
AP Photo/Cliff Owen
Conservatives have been alternately happy and unhappy with the Supreme Court rulings of late. It’s been quite a roller coaster ride not only of emotions, but on how the 4 originalist Justices will weigh in, or not, on certain critical suits; particularly as President Trump winds down his first term.
Fresh off the heels of the Justices’ refusal to hear the Texas 2020 Election complaint, and turning down a relief case from religious schools in the state of Kentucky, the 9 Justices have now kicked back
Trump v. New York. This case challenged President Trump’s plan to change the way that House seats are apportioned among the states by excluding illegal aliens from the recently completed Census data. It was split among ideological lines in a 6-3 decision, with the usual suspects of Justices Elena Kagan, Sonia Sotomayor, and Stephen Breyer dissenting.