comparemela.com

Latest Breaking News On - கற்று ஒற்றை நீதிபதி - Page 2 : comparemela.com

Delhi High Court Modifying Ex-parte Order For Plaintiff s Non-use Of The Trade Mark Emphasises Importance Of Thorough Diligence Before Filing - Intellectual Property

In the matter of Mittal Electronics v Sujata Home Appliances Private Limited & Ors , (Ref: CS(COMM) 60/2020 (Suit)), the Learned Single Judge of the Delhi High Court (Court) has passed an order dated 9 September 2020 (Decision) partially vacating the ex-parte ad-interim injunction granted to the Plaintiff (defined hereinafter) due to its non-use of the Trade Mark (defined hereinafter) in respect of the Defendants goods (defined hereinafter) and suppression of material facts. Factual Background In February 2020, Mittal Electronics (Plaintiff), claiming to be the adopter since 1980 and registered proprietor of the trade mark ‘SUJATA (Trade Mark) in various classes, including in class 11, instituted the Suit against Sujata Home Appliances

© 2024 Vimarsana

vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.