Media Credit: Courtesy of Kiran Hoeffner-Shah
Each year, graduating editors are given 30 final column inches to reflect on their time at The Hatchet, published in the final issues of the year. Journalists historically used “-30-” to signify the end of a story.
In my three years on staff, I probably set the record for the most missed staff meetings.
I never thought of missing the meeting as an absence, I just figured that everyone else was perpetually early – and I was fashionably late. There’s only so far that logic could take me, but someone really should have foreseen the problem when I was 30 minutes late to my staff interview.
About this Event
Should the courts review directors’ business judgment? This question has been canvassed extensively in academic literature. Arguments against such review include the dangers of judging directors’ decisions with the benefit of hindsight; the fact that judges lack business expertise and should not, therefore, second guess business decisions; that review of business judgment with liability would deter individuals from becoming directors; or that it would lead to more risk adverse decisions. Arguments for review include improving standards; deterring unfit directors; and, significantly, accountability of directors for harms they have caused through careless decisions.
This paper reassesses the debate, drawing on the findings of a two year Arts and Humanities Research Council funded study Business Judgment and the Courts. This project examined what was meant by business judgment; identified how the courts apply this concept; and assessed to what extent d
Democrats Seek to Undo Six ‘Midnight’ Regulations
email
Sunday was the deadline under the Congressional Review Act.
Democrats initiated the process to undo six last-minute regulations from the Trump administration using a special legislative authority ahead of the Sunday deadline.
The deadline was to introduce resolutions to dismantle last minute or “midnight” regulations issued between August 21, 2020, and January 3, 2021, as allowed by the Congressional Review Act. The estimated date was April 4 and while the parliamentarians are the definitive sources on the deadlines, they typically don’t release public statements on this issue, according to Daniel Perez, senior policy analyst at The George Washington University’s Regulatory Studies Center. Separately, the Senate has until sometime in mid-May to use special fast-track procedures that allow for a simple majority to pass a resolution. This is contingent upon how often they meet from now until then.
Forum provides many perspectives on work force housing crisis corneliustoday.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from corneliustoday.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
George Washington University student Tess Goddard tapes a letter to university president Thomas J. LeBlanc’s door, asking LeBlanc to close the university s Regulatory Studies Center. Credit: Sophie Gengler
In the midst of a climate crisis, every bit of action counts. That’s why we and other climate activists celebrated this past June, after months of organizing and agitating, when the administration at George Washington University committed to full divestment from fossil fuels, carbon neutrality by 2030, and eventually reversing the university’s entire 200-year carbon footprint. George Washington leadership aligned with science and acknowledged the need for society to transition off of fossil fuels as quickly as possible.