Of law and our fierce constitutional patriotism. Now, it looked like President Trump might get away with his ukraine shakedown. After all most americans didnt know anything about it and the few who learned of it would be too afraid, too intimidated to cross the most powerful man on earth. President trump could rest easy. But if donald trump misjudged the american character, the framers of our constitution did not. I count 17 honorable Public Servants who came forward to testify over the intimidation and disparagement of the president. Is that right, mr. Goldman . Yes. There was 17. And i counted dozen Career State Department and National Security officials who served republican and democratic president s alike over decades who came to testify. In fact, four of President Trumps own National Security council staffers, hill, vindman, morrison and maguire came
forward to report trumps scheme to nsc lawyers as soon as they learned of it, didnt they mr. Goldman. Morrison and vindman went to
minister comfort from the fact that the prime minister accepted the pay review hodies minister accepted the pay review bodies findings in full. i think the question, other parts of the public the question, other parts of the public services will be, will he be able public services will be, will he be abte to public services will be, will he be able to deliver, to fund those pay rises able to deliver, to fund those pay rises anyway but won t have a negative rises anyway but won t have a negative impact on services? i think our members will be looking long and hard that our members will be looking long and hard that because what they won t want to hard that because what they won t want to see is peter being robbed to pay paut want to see is peter being robbed to pay paul and those pay rises leading to a tax pay paul and those pay rises leading to a tax on pay paul and those pay rises leading to a tax on services or cuts to services. to a tax on services or cuts to serv
yourself about it but obviously you have the inability to convince anyone have the inability to convince anyone else about that. so if you made anyone else about that. so if you made any anyone else about that. so if you made any such arguments as a lawyer they would made any such arguments as a lawyer they would lose any case like that as you they would lose any case like that as you would never have an opportunity to argue except perhaps your own opportunity to argue except perhaps your own as you sit in the department of corrections. anything further? department of corrections. anything further? ., , department of corrections. anything further?- mr department of corrections. anything further?- mr alex department of corrections. anything | further?- mr alex murdaugh, further? no, sir. mr alex murdaugh, i sentence further? no, sir. mr alex murdaugh, i sentence you further? no, sir. mr alex murdaugh, i sentence you to further? no, sir. mr alex murdaugh, i sentence
you switch last minute, or last minute or days, you switch courses and admitted to being you switch courses and admitted to being there. that necessitated more lies and being there. that necessitated more lies and continue to lie, and where will it lies and continue to lie, and where will it end? lies and continue to lie, and where will it end? it has already ended for many will it end? it has already ended for many who have heard you and concluded for many who have heard you and concluded it will never end, but within concluded it will never end, but within your own soul you have to deal within your own soul you have to deal with within your own soul you have to deal with it within your own soul you have to deal with it. and i know you have to see paut deal with it. and i know you have to see paul and deal with it. and i know you have to see paul and maggie during the night time when see paul and maggie during the night time when you attempt to go to sleep ti
nationally syndicated radio show. and dear friend of min e, great? one . go?d blam i thank me. god bless us .s us wow, you sound pretty good. i ll tell i ll give you my take on this washington post piece. the question is , why would they put it out now? i think paut nm haow?s a very go theory. i have a different theory. and my theory is this is old news. gtheyunter have indicted a lon a long time ago. they are protecting joe of time go there protecting joe , of course, because they re not getting into thegetting any ofh linsky laptop information, which is ripe for taking. joe biden is a manchurian putative president , inpaid for my view. he s bought and paid for not just by the communist regime, but others. that said, i lerl tells. you wht i think s going on here. this leak is numerous sources. for some reason, they mentionedn donald trump twice, who hasld tp absolutely t nothing to do. with this matter.i thin i think what they re trying tokt foundation, s lay a predicate, a founda