we want you to make that determination, as well. that is the problem with the law. it s not just bringing your life experiences, because you can have blacks that have been in high crime areas who also feel that a person has to defend himself. i think the law cannot be set up to where you cannot make objective analysis. and this law is set up where they are saying do what you think is reasonable and anyone in the world can decide reasonable differently from everyone else in the world. that is a dangerous law. that is a dangerous law. also, there are no equal protection under the law. that is the problem with the way the law is set up is that the law is not enforced the same way it is for blacks as it is for whites. you had in the george zimmerman case, one of the jurors in that trial who said she fought for conviction. listen to this.
i m thinking to myself, did i go to right way or wrong way? i went the right way because the law. if i would have used my heart i probably would have went hung jury. some people have said george zimmerman got away with murder. how do you respond to those people who say that? george zimmerman got away with murder, but you can t get away from god. and at the end of the day he s going to have a lot of questions and answers he has to deal with. so here you have a juror from the zimmerman trial again saying about the law and she fought for a conviction that ended up voting acquittal. all of them voted acquittal.
after 30 hours three jurors believed dunn acted in self-defense. that means nine thought he was guilty. what happened inside the jury room? there were reports that there was yelling heard coming from the deliberation room. at at one point we were all trying to get the point across. screaming? people passionate about their position. yes, sir. tempers, cursing, screaming. the majority who thought michael dunn was guilty couldn t convince three of their fellow jurors. what swayed those jurors and how might this effect the retrial. back with me is faith jenkins. joining us now is dr. marshall, a nationally recognized trial and jury consultant. thank you for being here. appreciate it. thank you for having me. why couldn t a majority c
and not only that, when it was discussed, i was told, well, someone could have gotten hurt. could have. we re talking about cases where people got killed. and the person who did it walked. it s something wrong with that process. congresswoman i mean, no one can understand it. and we must change the law. well, we re going to stay on this, and we re going to keep fighting. thank you so much, congresswoman corrine brown for your time tonight. thank you. ahead, did the prosecutor mishandle the case against michael dunn? new questions tonight about whether angela corey repeated her mistakes from the zimmerman trial. also, what happened to those racially charged letters that dunn wrote from jail? why weren t they used at trial? the answer might surprise you. plus, marching for justice in peace. what young men of color are
all right. ken, your reaction to the verdict. well, justice was not completely served here. we have a stand your ground law in florida which trips up juries. it creates violence out on the streets. it places our young men and women in danger. and when it comes time for justice at a courtroom and a trial, the stand your ground law is inserted into the law, and it makes it more difficult for juries to understand how to apply this law and how to get to justice. when the evidence is as clear as it is in this case, and this was a very strong, very clear second-degree murder case. when you have a case like that, and then you insert this law that makes it very difficult for jurors to apply and to understand and be able to not be confused, you lead to problems where you can t get a verdict and you get a hung jury. and then on top of that, a prosecution team where the jury makes the same mistakes. it was clearly a case of being