that i think is true. i mean when trump was campaigning. he specifically said, of course, it is all over twitter and reminding him that we ll not cut your medicaid or medicare and we ll make sure that everybody has health insurance. it is been repeated a zillion times. now, he attaches himself on what he can get through the house. there is a lot of ideal he cannot control his caucus because he cannot get anything done. we have seen trump s world get on the phone and called up networks and called up the new york times.
that miguel was walking through. after his wife vanished he disguised himself as a deaf mute woman and that s when he fought with his neighbor morris black, ultimately dismembering him. durst jumped bond and then caught himself, got caught shoplifting at sandwich while he had hundreds of dollars in his pocket. he was acquitted of that killing. his attorneys did not want him to speak with the documentary makers of the jinx. it s like he was looking into a crystal ball of sorts. here he is. they said about a zillion times, you can t help yourself. right now you re a free man 100%. you say something inadvertently and you ll find yourself charged in new york or charged in los angeles. and our interview was a big risk for you. why do you want to do an interview? okay. let s talk about this with legal
him not to talk. they said around a zillion times, you can t help yourself. right now, you re a freeman man 100%. you say something inadvertently and you ll find yourself charged in mork or charged in los angeles. reporter: in 2003 he went on trial for the murder of his name. some thought the evidence was overwhelming overwhelming. a lot of people are stunned by this verdict. we, the jury, find the defendant robert durst not guilty. reporter: lawyers arguedself defense and the jury acquitted. we have done our job. we presented what we could but, yes, we remain disappointed in the verdict. reporter: for the documentary director andrew da recchi questioned durks urst for 24 hours. i think what we get is he willing to talk about this context about things he has never spoken about before. reporter: the film uncovers
emotional and physical abuse. that s kind of where it stops. the parents are hold on parents are sometimese. they screw up a lot. i screwed up a lot more than a zillion times, that itself way it happens. the kids screw up, too. it s not the court s job to come in and say this is how you will parent. i do admire the kid s moxie for doing this, if she had showed that much motivation in going out and earning money, she would be having a full ride at harvard. there is not the court s job. it s their job to enforce contract law. maybe she has a contract. it s between the kids and the parents. there is no contract. she s not a minor anymore. i m giving the last word to the jersey girl. she devs nothing. thanks, guys, thank you, christian, for joining us. we appreciate it. girl scouts of america, to
and when you raise the price of employment, guess what happens. you get less of it. that has been the argument since the dawn of time. you can t have a minimum wage. you certainly can t raise the minimum wage. because that will mean employers will higher fewer people. unemployment will go up. you will cost people their jobs. it s always the same argument. but here s the thing. we can check to see if that argument works. because we ve done this before a zillion times. at various times we have both established a minimum wage and raised the minimum wage in states like florida, colorado, ohio, missouri, alaska, kansas, just about anywhere in the country. when it happens federally we can compare before and after and when it happens between states we can compare what happens. this isn t a hypothetical question. we can look at the cause and effect of these policies. this is empirical. this is knowable. and here s what we know. raising the minimum wage has little to no effect on low wage emp