people you talk to analyzing that debate think he had a very good debate in part because he went after us and the questions. but arguably, defending the questions, one, chris wallace was asking about how he runs his campaign, if he s going the run the country, that s a fair country about how you run your campaign. two, on the libya question he did say those things, and the question was are you certain about the way forward now. after the debate he thought he had a pretty good debate, and if you look at it, i think it was pretty interesting across the two hours and substantive despite all the focus and the coverage on the back and forth and the process and the questions. megyn: you know, i had to laugh because in the law, when i used to practice law they used to tell you you can beat up on a witness if witness is unsympathetic. so when i saw him beating up on chris wallace, i thought, oh, that s okay, no one s going to feel bad for chris wallace. but when i saw him beating up on
serious about gadhafi going, this is what we should do. the following interview came after the same president said, well, i didn t really meant go meant go, i meant maybe we should have a humanitarian intervention. now, the fact that i was commenting on fox about a president that changes his opinion every other day ought to be covered by a fox commentator using all the things i said, not hand picking the ones that fit your premise. megyn: so that and his exchange with chris wallace which preceded it where he said, you know, he called the question sort of mickey mouse questions and gotcha questions and wanted chris to get off of those, in his view, have made a lot of headlines, bret. what did you make of it? well, i think speaker gingrich had that in his back pocket megyn: he kind of admitted that on hannity last night. yeah, and be he did. and i think that was to make a moment, and he did. he made a few moments. and to his credit he really did step it up, and i think a lot of