Now, that is not to say that our labor market is perfect. Labor force Participation Rate is hovering near an alltime low. There are a lot of things that Government Policies do to depress that labor force your some of the things i note in my review our Social Security disability insurance, it has very lax standards. It literally pays ablebodied americans not to work. We fix those things, i think we can boost labor force participation. Get people working in the economy. In terms of whether automation is going to destroy the labor market, i would caution against destroy the robots. Proven otherwise. Host scott, we are out of time. I want to thank you for talking to his heard the National Review cover story, the enemy come the truth about trade, you can read it online. Thank you sir. Thank you for having me. That does it for the washington journal. Thank you for calling in this morning. Well be back with another program. Enjoy the rest of your day. [captions Copyright National cable satell
Number. Women voters only, what is your view of the new york billionaire . Poll that came out found out he has low favorability with women. This is what they report. Negativeericans have a view of donald trump. Upng women, the numbers go to 70 negative and 21 positive. Dig deeper into the numbers and you get a sense of how big mr. Trumps problem is. Gap edge is a wellknown fact of modern politics. White women often tend to lead republican. 2000 12, mitt romney one white women by 14 points. In the latest poll, white women go to Hillary Clinton in a general election matchup with mr. Trump by 10 points. Swing d equal a 24 whiteoint swing in the women vote between 2012 in 2016. What do you think about this . What is your view of donald trump . Mr. Trump has gone to twitter to talk about the issue, saying the press is going out of the way to convince people i do not like women, when that is the opposite. On women. Is after me this is a tough business. He said women love donald trump. His ex
Earning terrorist incubating in a mosque next door but what about those agitating refugee camps that are poorly resourced . Their lives have gone from deplorable to unimaginable and their rage will easily be redirected at the west in the hands of capable imams. The u. S. Is taken on millions of refugees from unpopular places over the years, vietnam, russia, burma iraq. By and large be a slightly simpler than that and worked and made the country a better place. My mom and her family fled romania after tangling with the nazis and the russians that they were suspiciously hazed once i got the boat over here. I dont trust our government to do much but i do know the engine of optimism that fuels most people who land here is a word investment. Certainly the Obama Administration has to do more to explain and execute the vetting process than just say, trust me. We have to know people coming over here are wellintended as they distort that they distort the heaven and they must be subjected to an
Earning terrorist incubating in a mosque next door but what about those agitating refugee camps that are poorly resourced . Their lives have gone from deplorable to unimaginable and their rage will easily be redirected at the west in the hands of capable imams. The u. S. Is taken on millions of refugees from unpopular places over the years, vietnam, russia, burma iraq. By and large be a slightly simpler than that and worked and made the country a better place. My mom and her family fled romania after tangling with the nazis and the russians that they were suspiciously hazed once i got the boat over here. I dont trust our government to do much but i do know the engine of optimism that fuels most people who land here is a word investment. Certainly the Obama Administration has to do more to explain and execute the vetting process than just say, trust me. We have to know people coming over here are wellintended as they distort that they distort the heaven and they must be subjected to an
Other. These are things that we should caviat there is no snap of the figures and in every wikipedia articles fully informative. But by getting a cohort of people who are highly knowledgeable and good editors will start to see Higher Quality articles that go deeper into what a bill does. What the circumstances are now, how it would affect things and what the outcome would be. Just to be circular, we can say the Washington Post, and put a sentence in there about with the Washington Post said. There is a certain level of adding references on the newspaper level, and then the next that is to go to the scientific papers. We will try to find Academic Studies with support statements. That is the next level of quality as we go along. We are just about out of time. Thank you all for coming. If you work on the hill as a congressional staffer, you care about the wellbeing of our republic, hopefully this battle has encourage you to become more involved in wikipedia editing and improve the debate.