and on top of that, even if you re not sick, if you re circulating it, then you re helping us get to the next problem. i m not worried about the delta variant, i m worried about the epsilon variant. yeah, absolutely. i think it s interesting to see how dr. fauci has had to evolve in his strategy on attacking this. he tried explaining the science. that clearly hasn t worked. i think now we re at a point of peer pressure and taking away toys from people, taking away the things they re going to be s able to do. you will not be able to go to a baseball game without a mask ont six months down the line if yous don t get the vaccine now, that kind of thing. and i think that s really, unfortunately, where the effectiveness is going to lie at and where we re going to see some change.e i wish we had time to play the video of dr. fauci rolling his neck at rand paul in a senate committee this week and saying you do not know what you are talking about. like oh, my gosh, you had a conversation w
with president trump declaring a national emergency and taking money that congress refused to give him? you know, no, i don t. i just listened to your panel, and i think so many it s all minutiae. all you guys were talking about was minutiae. katie pavlich had it right, we have an emergency. this is an invasion. the very existence and definition of american culture, the rule of law, why does nobody talk about the fact that millions and millions and millions of people are breaking the law coming here illegally and that the democrat party wants that to happen? we can t have the breakdown of rule of law and law and order in this way. that alone would suggest that this has gone on way too long and needs to stop. the argument about where drugs come into the country, can anybody deny they re coming in, and it needs to stop, and it s destroying future generations of the country? we re so caught up in the game of how washington debates issues, it is undeniable that we have a major immigrat
coming across the border in 2000 as now, so why is that a back then, 95% could be turned around in a matter of days. as a result of loopholes, activist judicial rulings and increasing sophistication from cartels, the reality is, is that more than half the people crossing the border are what we call non-impactful, they can t be turned around. what you see is sophisticated operations and smugglers will actually push out migrants and children and family units to divert border agents, and then because there s not secured areas with the wall, they ll then cross. a fundamental level, we could go could down to the details as much as you want to chris: please don t. [laughter] but the bottom line is this, you cannot conceive of a nation without a strong, secure border. it is fundamental and essential to the idea of sovereignty and national survival to have control over who enters and doesn t enter the country. we can get into the statistics. you want to talk about drugs,
some political opportunity while the president basically. is reds the constitution reds the constitution and flushes it down the toilet. here s my question, rush. i understand that you like what president trump is doing and you didn t like what president obama was doing, but that s the concern here, is that to the degree that you give the president more and more powers, yes, you re going to get some things, executive powers from one president you like, but you re going to get executive powers from another president that you don t like. you may look at it that way, i don t. i look at it right and wrong. and what obama was doing was furthering this existing problem in a he was politicizing this using whatever executive powers he wanted to use. yes, i objected to that but primarily because of what he was doing with these executive powers. he was taking action that i deemed to be harmful to the country. i look at what trump is doing as something he has to do because he s not gett
have been involved in a legitimate don t know how it s going to turn out but a legitimate investigation of possible collusion and possible obstruction of justice. the other theory of the case is that the real scandal here is how comey and mccabe and lisa page and peter strzok and bruce ohr have behaved and how they acted and particularly how they acted to some degree in the clinton case, but even more so in the trump case. where do you come down? well, i think the actions of some of those actors cast a dark spell on the fbi. i don t know why we continue to talk about andrew mccabe or listen to him. the inspector general determined he lied multiple times including three times under oath. andrew mccabe, in here theory, s supposed to be leading the investigation into hillary clinton, and he says he was worried about russia collusion. there s $145 million from russians given to the hillary and bill clinton foundation when she was tear of state. secretary of state, and he s sittin