and he did it without the help of anyone.s ad none of his advisors wanteviserg to use on foreign policy. i policyp to b desperately wanted trump to be quiet, bute n trump wouldn t. what s the point of nato ?t nat he asked nearly thirty years y after the fall of the soviet aft union, no one in washington could answer him. p racist shut up. racist, they replied. but trump just kept going in. his trump way. russia, why would we fight russia? he wondered.e wouldn t making russia our our enemy just drive putin into the arms of china? inand create the most powerful and dangerous anti-american bloc in history? no one bothered to answerbody him. in fact, for the sin of asking,y they called him a traitorch to his country.ed him for they impeached him for it. it se ind then they started a war with putin. but in retrospect, trump asked a deeply patriotic question.ue if russista everion. joined fors with china, american global hegemony, its power would end instantly. you d have the w
everybodmosty directly involved is dead. i mean, james , angleton diedsl a long time ago. really thi so really, this could only be institutions protect reputatio their institutional reputations or maybe it s darker than that. like, what ns or thans what . the explanation? everyone s gone. oh, look, in washington, weoney have a family theory. it s money, power,r, vanity . theyin some cases inal washington, it s all three . the they worried they rey goinge to lose some money if someone finds out there were bad acts 60 years ago, the reputation ofi agencies are justr poli their political power base. tical powebut my theory goes ju the opposite. i actually think we need have to have a much more open government. dromard, more open to american i citizens like adults. e th exactly. and i think actually that may be the moment that you have people starte to trust institutions again, a man tucker:y the onlyp fo disinfects if this ever comes up for a vote.te, i would love fori youd to com