From Susan Crichton that due to advice from external lawyers, there was a need from external lawyers, there was a need for from external lawyers, there was a need for a from external lawyers, there was a need for a review to ensure that proper need for a review to ensure that proper disclosure had been given in previous proper disclosure had been given in previous criminal cases. Yes. You say that previous criminal cases. Yes. You say that you previous criminal cases. Yes. You say that you had a conversation with lestey say that you had a conversation with lestey saut say that you had a conversation with lesley saul in which she told you that the lesley saul in which she told you that The Post Office had been advised that The Post Office had been advised that the expert with witness that the advised that the expert with witness that The Post Office had used in crimihat that The Post Office had used in criminal cases to give evidence about criminal cases to give evidence about horizon h
with vaccine passports. today s spokesperson from the prime minister was saying there will be detailed plans for these vaccine passports and how they can recommend. there s no sign of the government backing down on this but the study will give the three met them food for thought. it s a really interesting one. i found it s a really interesting one. i found the it s a really interesting one. i found the numbers quite interesting. it found the numbers quite interesting. it does found the numbers quite interesting. it does kind of a raise in questions because it does kind of a raise in questions because you would think that it would because you would think that it would encourage people. i think that was probably part of the governments aim. was probably part of the governments aim i was probably part of the governments aim ithink was probably part of the governments aim. i think at the time there was talk about aim. i think at the time there was talk about whether or not by
because he really did want to set up a direct line of communication with vladimir putin. and this guy said he was friendly with vladimir putin. i don t know if that s supposed to make us feel better or worse about that meeting. senator ron widen of oregon , to his credit, tends to be one of the pushier members of the senate intelligence committee. which is the committee that hosted jared kushner today. senator wyden i can tell you right now will not tell us what happened behind closed doors today with jared kushner. but senator wyden did make a public statement today saying that jared kushner s statement, quote, raises far more questions than it answers. why is he saying that? we ll find out next. you tot. nobody s hurt, but there will still be pain. it comes when your insurance company says they ll only pay three-quarters of what it takes to replace it. what are you supposed to do? drive three-quarters of a car?
state as he runs for virginia, number one. number two, i don t think that s that sentiment or that idea is reflective of the party as a whole. but there is a legitimate point to be made about, i think, underneath that argument is how these programs function. i have been paying into the system since i was 14 years old and got my first job. i don t expect to reap the benefit of all the dollars that i have put into the system which programs are you talking about you won t benefit from? the social security program, for example. i have been paying since my first job at age 14 years old. you tot. i know. you don t think you re going to get anything out of social security? i m not going to get that money back. but this is the broader point. i get it. but the question we have to look at is for future generations, that 20-something-year-old, that 30-year-old in the next 20 to 30 years let s get back to the argument your party has been making, not all of you. this argument it
whole. but there is a legitimate point to be made about, i think, underneath that argument is how these programs function. i have been paying into the system since i was 14 years old and got my first job. i don t expect to reap the benefit of all the dollars that i have put into the system which programs are you talking about you won t benefit from? the social security program, for example. i have been paying since my first job at age 14 years old. you tot. i know. you don t think you re going to get anything out of social security? i m not going to get that money back. but this is the broader point. i get it. but the question we have to look at is for future generations, that 20-something-year-old, that 30-year-old in the next 20 to 30 years let s get back to the argument your party has been making, not all of you. this argument it s basically all a trick. get the people to buy into these social programs so they ll become dependent people. that s the old romney line.