ino sh a spirited debate. it was easier to shut down unwelcome speechspeech, and writ all off as misinformation. they were trying protect you, america. the only way we get past amer is if we arerefu careful about what we say and we use a power that we have to limitwhat w spread of that misinformation. my hope is that facebook, instead of taking it personally, that somehow i m saying facebook is telling people that they would do something about the misinformation or depending on the sociainl giants, to take down untruths and things of this sort. huntee downr biden, this lapp that intelligence officials have warneat inteld is likely rn disinformation. pr the golden oldies only much of what they were protecting you from durinotg election cycls turned out to be true. now the censorship squad has i been exposed and a bombshell ruling on july 4th. a federal judge in louisiana has blocke has bd the federal government from contacting or comeeting with media giants.ns it turns o
as a director of national intelligence, as you talkeedd, one of the things that i did was on a daily basis prepared, c the president s daily brief. that s a collection and aggregation ofags of our sensitive intelligence to brief the president on national security oitive . w one of the tools that wee wa use there was section seven or two of the foreign intelligence surveillance. i was going to brin g. also the that s the same tool that was abused to spy on the trump campaign. and so now when 702 comes up for renewal at the end of this year, you have republicans saying we can t renew that inecause its current form because it s beend political reasons. and so the abuses, orwelliant abuses that i think the judge correctly characterizedterize and really placed our national ou by these riskd officials, putting political objectives above america s security posture. it s just incredibly dangerous that you believengeroy they really need that surveillance capability, but it shouldn t exten