steve: is that true? it s absolutely true. they will take federal taxpayer dollars, they get benefits, and healthcare and work on union activity. that doesn t count as campaigning. we are funding it. it s one of the biggest things of all-times. this is corruption at the highest level. they are working on behalf of the candidates. the whole movement to get out the vote. they are there on election day. literally while on the federal dime and getting paid and putting forward their own candidates. they use the power to also boycott others and create mess in the area and total pandemonium no one can get
that. we ll watch for the results. we thank you for being with us. thank you. steve: jason, let s go to your list. the role of the public sector is so interesting. i want to put it in the context of the populous movement. they are too weak in america. you have a lot of abuse in workers in the private sector. the role of sub lick sectors is incredibly negative in terms of blocking things. this is an important supreme court ruling. they are taking millions of dollars and galvinize thousands of people and lobby to elect democrats. these are federal workers that many of them work 100% of their time on union activity.
impact. the organize is at the port. in many ways, it s such a cool part of the democratic party aesop ration. that s what is really at stake here. how they are reacting to this fatal blow, you know not fatal but crippling blow. i guess i correct that just a touch and talk about the government unions as a movement in themselves. certainly here in new york and states across the country the unions are a political thing that are reckoned to be dealt with. they organize, they are involved in lobbying and statehouses in the federal government. they are involved in political campaigns. you know, every dollars that comes away will have an impact on their ability to organize and impact policy and election. steve: thank you so much. that s a great summery of all of
that someone from the white house is able to articulate with regard to american policy in this part of the world? and how does this attack fit into that strategic context? we have no idea about any of those things at this hour. we are also joined, thank you steve, by heidi pris bolla, senior politics correspondent for u.s.a. today, who is with us from washington, which may be good because she went to michigan state and eugene here went to michigan. so we try to keep at least one city between them at all times. heidi, what do you make of the follow-on? tomorrow morning is going to dawn to steve s point, we are going to have a discussion about military matters where north korea is concerned. and areas of joint cooperation between china and the u.s. and there has to be some
steve, the time there were a couple day delay. if i remember correctly it was a tuesday the first night, wednesday was the second night of the protest. it wasn t until the weekend where things heated up. do you expect anything different? sounds it was peaceful last night. rowdy two nights ago. peaceful last night. do you think they go back to the more outrageous behavior? reporter: i think the fact these two policemen have been shot has thrown a wrench in the momentum of the protesters plus they got so many of their demands met. but we ve seen surprises before. twists and turns and a crowd can build here very suddenly. but unless we see dramatic new information about this shooter who he is or how he s treated, i think we re going to see the numbers go down at this point. but that s a guess. steve, is it the ferguson police or outside st. louis county police taking the lead on