bombers biden and blenkin arere hoping for with their recent r recenttrips to ukraine and ean europe. biden s presence there when he wasn t tripping upstairs was meant to bolster and reassurwae the people of the region funding a proxy war againstre. russia. g with tens of billions off dollars in us aid. that s one thingdollar. the but by actually showing upthe wl there, he wanted the world to know that he s making a personal commitment to ukraine. our commitment is too the the people of ukraine and the future of ukraine.e no there should be no doubt our support for ukraine will not waver america to with you and the world stands with you. witkyiv has captured a part of my heart, i must say.say. while biden and his entour entourage showed up in ukrainear aineand then poland, because, an ,they want everyone to knowto dt they re going to do whatever it takes and they relish the rolef of being europe s protector. rope sbut what about being amers protector? once a while? a
and guess what?n because of the fights that we had in early january , we have actually have exquisite tools now to target those agenciess ns and those bureaucrats with specific votes to defund them and defanh otes to g them. yeah, and also legislation that it does have some bipartisan support like banning tic-tac tik and removing the permanent normal trade relations and stats for china.ha cong would that would shake it i up. congressman, great to see you.sr ea youand again, we empathizehie with the frustration of marjorie taylor greeneit is noti the solution. all right.e gr don lemon is back fromeene his brainwashing. i mean, sorry, sensitivityn training. plus, biden bringswashing, his . swagger to europe. raymond arroyo has all the details. and seen and unseen next . i can t believe this is how you talk to your friends. this is talking. did you have a nice day? look at the size of these butterfly shrimp shine normed for shrimp. what now? she s talking. been h
hair. steve: you know what? during valentine s day don t exchange hair. make them something to eat. ainsley: i m glad we don t do that anymore. i do not want a lump of someone s hair as a gift. steve: say hello to chef mark bailey author of fascinating book it s called cooking in boxers. [cheers] janice: we noticed that right away. why didn t you come in your outfit. little too chilly for boxers. brian: why cook in boxers comfortable? that s my comfort. i don t advocate everyone cooking in boxers but i do. steve: you sr. a self-described breakfast guru. show us how to make breakfast for dinner. light and quick some of the things i like about breakfast. you keep it fast and easy. last minute lovers. i want to start with a little libation. wet our appetite. created by nicki minaj. moss kyoto. it s so great because it really can go with your appetizer. steve: bubbly white wine? simple moscato, it s
very beautiful graz. do you remember when we were young, some of us, some of you are or so you don t remember because you sr. so young already. we have a young audience. do you remember we had stamped on to cars and stamped on to equipment made in the u.s.a.? right? made in the u.s.a. [cheers and applause] right? even the young people like it. and, frankly, if it said made in japan or made some place else, it wasn t considered good. it wasn t considered good. we re going to bring back made in the u.s.a. and we re going to have a lot of jobs come back. we re going to have a lot of jobs. and you know what? if companies leave and fire their workers, they leave pennsylvania. or they leave indiana. or they leave any one of the states we are talking about or any state in the union, they leave, and they go to mexico or some other country, plenty of them and they think they are going to fire everybody and they are going to have their product
that s slightly obscure. glass stealing was a law that separated investment banks and commercial banks, the vanilla, you have depository accounts and investment banks are higher risk, doing deals and things like that. the two had to be kept secret under glass segal. that was revealed in 2000. i am championing a public option for banking. i find this argument novel. public option for banking or try to do something intrinsically risky and dangerous. for something short and protected. two questions. reihan. first of all, if we lived in the world of your public option, would you not rescue the scary dangerous casino banks? would you let them go under? absolutely. in the european central bank, you have a situation where banks are being able to use bank loans as collateral. i am not defending the system. i am not saying that you sr.