we don t know if the people who do smoke might have been dumber before they started smoking. yes. i think you are on to something. i don t know what it is. i don t think i agree with it. possibly you have a point. they studied a lot of pair of brothers where one smokes and ones who didn t. and i swear those would didn t smoke were smarter. and unless perhaps it is difficult for smart people to justify smoking. tas what most of us have found. it becomes very hard. i don t justify smoking. i just say it is fun, right, bill. it is fun. but the more i think about what jim says the more i think he has a point. the biggest myth in america is that, well, the older generation, we didn t know how bad it was. people knew smoking caused cancer way back in the 20s. yet, we all still did it.
bad for a longtime. yeah. and then you stopped. i was drinking soda and then they said it gave you pancreatic study. that was just one study. there was a correlation. don t worry about it. i disarted drinking it again. they say nonsmokers do better on tests, but is that because smokers are on some level jonesing for a cigarette and find it easier to relax while taking the test. i think this is anti-smoking propaganda, remi. you are a smoker. i wouldn t be surprised if it is this study it is about. jim is right. by taking these tests, the smoker may have been going through withdrawal symptom so they maybe didn t per rm to well during the test. i don t think one has anything to do with the other. my theory is smoking ix ma you smarter. they compared people who don t smoke and people who do smoke.