harvard law review back at harvard. and he is the top obama guy in terms of helping him with the transition at the time. between the bush presidency and the obama presidency and obviously was appointed number three at the department of justice. in fact, emails show that pirelli was very active talking about these, this case in the days before it was dropped. i don t know perez came in after the fact. pretended none of these political people were involved and perez himself is another democratic activist. he ran for public office in maryland. bill: but perez is in trouble now i don t think under this justice department he would be but he could be charged with perjury because he testified under oath in front of the civil rights commission and said no, none of that. this his false testimony it. i think it s false testimony. it s been out there for some time. the justice department has refused to act on it. and this latest piece of litigation they are still defending what perez said
harvard law review back at harvard. and he is the top obama guy in terms of helping him with the transition at the time. between the bush presidency and the obama presidency and obviously was appointed number three at the department of justice. in fact, emails show that pirelli was very active talking about these, this case in the days before it was dropped. i don t know perez came in after the fact. pretended none of these political people were involved and perez himself is another democratic activist. he ran for public office in maryland. bill: but perez is in trouble now i don t think under this justice department he would be but he could be charged with perjury because he testified under oath in front of the civil rights commission and said no, none of that. this his false testimony it. i think it s false testimony. it s been out there for some time. the justice department has refused to act on it. and this latest piece of litigation they are still defending what perez said
of the two panthers that you saw in that tape was sanctioned, said you can t go within 100 yards of a polling place or whatever. it was nothing. that happened under the obama administration. but it was a joke because nothing really happened. they just ignored everything. they have you had been held in contempt because they didn t show up. now, sam hirsch. who is sam hirsch? who is that? he is a top official at the justice department. he was a deputy to the number three official. he is a former obama donor, democratic lawyer, active in litigating on behalf of the democratic party interest. now is he in the justice department making decisions like this. and he. bill: why we have that kind of clout though. you shaw perez. perez goes in and says no, no, no. politics had nothing to do with it. we just didn t think there was enough evidence. come on. but why would hirsch have that kind of power? because he was the boss of all the folks who were making the decision as to what to do
reggie walton says indicates political pressure was in play. judge walton writing, quote: the documents reveal that political appointees within doj were conferring about the status and resolution of the new black panther party case in the days breeding the doj s dismissal of claims in that case. which would appear to contradict assistant attorney general perez testimony that political leadership was not involved. in that decision, unquote. because of judge walton s ruling mr. perez may be investigated for perjury. happens, this is another political embarrassment for the obama administration and attorney general holder. it is widely believed that mr. holder blends justice with politics at times we say that without any agenda. praised the justice department for charging andrew goodman with federal crimes, circumventing a new york
reggie walton says indicates political pressure was in play. judge walton writing, quote: the documents reveal that political appointees within doj were conferring about the status and resolution of the new black panther party case in the days breeding the doj s dismissal of claims in that case. which would appear to contradict assistant attorney general perez testimony that political leadership was not involved. in that decision, unquote. because of judge walton s ruling mr. perez may be investigated for perjury. but no matter what happens, this is another political embarrassment for the obama administration and attorney general holder. it is widely believed that mr. holder blends justice with politics at times we say that without any agenda. praised the justice department for charging andrew goodman with federal crimes, circumventing a new york