David cameron is travelling to gibraltar today. Another of top diplomats will attend. The sides are likely to discuss how to manage the border with gibraltar. The meeting is not expected to result in a final agreement. For more on the lets speak to make it big. Tell us how this all came about after brexit. Good morning. Forthe this all came about after brexit. Good morning. For the past four years since brexit, you could say for the past eight years since the fateful vote in 2016, there had been in negotiations between the eu, spain and the uk about what happens to gibraltar and as you outlined, its geography makes it unique, a British Sovereign territory but on the tip of spain and the spanish have said they wanted it back, for the british they say this is a matter of sovereignty and that will not be del carbon and was People Living in gibraltar seem to favour british road, some surveys suggest that. The issue is not creating friction on the border between gibraltar and friction on th
decision, how do you control so no one else that s not a human being can make those firing decisions. these are all things being developed as we speak. one consistent point, jessica, that age is already here. it is here now. and before we let you go, i also want to ask you about u.s. aid, both to israel and ukraine. but specifically the ukraine aid seems to be somewhat in limbo, both of them need to get over the finish line. what are you hearing on that front? yeah, the irony of this, and i hear this from lawmakers in both parties, is that large ma majorities in both parties, the senate and the house, want to pass both israel and ukraine aid. there is a small population, particularly among republicans in the house, who are standing in the way. the leadership won t bring this to the floor. so negotiations are under way to get over that. they ve been focused in the senate where you would have a combination of things. ukraine, israel, but also new measures for border securit
Power of the office to obtain an improper personal benefit while ignoring and injuring the national interest. Or acts in ways that are grossly inconsistent with and undermine the separation of powers that is the foundation of our democratic system. Now, these this question of whether president engaged in abuse of power came up before when this congress considered the impeachment of president nixon. And after action was taken, president nixon famously said if the president does it, it is not illegal. And this body rejected that because thats not so. That goes directly contrary to what the founders said. But President Trump has said the same thing in responding to the prior investigation by Department Of Justice and defending his conduct. Here is what he said then i have an article, too, where i have to write to do whatever i want as president. That he has the right to do
whatever he wants as president. That is as wrong as when president nixon said a similar thing. That is not what the c
Nfc. Is he the person that put it in the server . He testified to it. You have to ask him. Id love to do this. We would love to have these witnesses love to have the server . Id love to have the witnesses. We have people running around ukraine looking for a server under some cloud strike notion. We have 67 of the officials bribing officials as well. Thats theres no credible witness that said theres anything in the transcript that was not there. None of your witnesses i find the president goes out, issues this unclassified statement and theres a statement out there somewhere in a classified server that may have gotten there mistakingly according to mr. Morrison as youre testifying, but my question ultimately would be why is it there . Why hasnt it been retrieved and why have you all not received it. I digress. Let me go on and finish up with
this unclassified mr. Hastings, theres an implication here and id like a clarification. Are you implying theres another transcript out there . Im i
Whatwe that means, its to use e power of the office to obtain an improper personal benefit while ignoring orfi injuring the national interest, or acts in ways that are grossly inconsistent with and undermine the separation of powers that is the foundation of our democratic system. Now, this question of whether the president engaged in abuse of power came up before when this congress considered the impeachment of president nixon. And president nixon famously said, if the president does it, it is notde illegal. And this body rejected that because thats not so. That goes directly contrary to what the founders said. But President Trump has said the same thing in responding to the prior investigation by the Department Of Justice and defending his conduct. Heres what he said. I have an article 2 where i have the right to do whatever i want as president. That he has the right to do whatever he wants as president. That is as wrong as when president nixon said a similar thing. That is not what