her private server. i want those emails out. nobody has a bigger interest in getting them released than i do. i respect the state department. they have their process that they do for everybody not just for me. but anything that they might do to expedite that process i heartedly support. fox news chief white house correspondent ed henry joins us live from cedar falls, iowa. ed? great to see you it s interesting, greta. you heard her former secretary of state clinton putting the onus on the state department. the state department is saying well it might take until january of 2016 to release some of these tens of thousands of emails that hillary clinton turned over that they are going through looking for sensitive information. remember, these are from her personal account. the personal server, but had some official business. and so we are trying to find out was there benghazi-related information, russia, you name it hillary clinton saying that she believes this will show that she was
a strong secretary of state and more eager than anyone number one if it s put out there in january of 2016, and there is anything that s damaging that would be a couple weeks before the iowa caucuses are here. she wants that out now so she can deal with it not before next year before caucuses and primaries. when she put the onus on the state department saying they are their documents now. it s up to them to go through this process. a federal judge said they have to speed that process up. remember, as you noted greta, these he emails started in the personal server of hillary clinton. she does want to be transparent. does want to get them out there. she could have put these emails out there a long time ago. it s interesting as she is playing a little defense finally taking questions from reporters today here in iowa, she is putting the onus on state department when the emails were in her possession all along. is she interviewing with local iowa media at all. i know she is not talking t
campbell thank you. not only did the seals kill the man we all wanted dead but they also grabbed a treasure trove of information bin laden s documents. how did they get so much evidence so quickly? congressman ryan zincky joins us. good evening sir. good to be with you greta. tell me, sir they weren t on the ground very long. i assume that they trained to get in there and get everything in sight? well, they do. these are pros. sensitive sight exploration is what they do. they will look at computers wrap everything up and grab as much information as they can. things that are obvious things that would not be obvious to some. cell phones, laptops any documents. wrap it up and a lot of the analysis is away from the target when they are in a safer area. ambassador john bolton was just on and he said that he would be reluctant i can t remember his exact words, reluctant to release even the 100 or so documents we got today because he thinks that somehow may tip
with the iranians as he did with the united states senate. look at the amendments he wouldn t allow on this deal. wouldn t allow them to say release the prisoners. wouldn t allow them to say iran has got to recognize a right of israel to exist. he wouldn t even say iran needs to stop supporting state sponsored terrorism. this is a bad deal. start nuclear arms race in the middle east. i feel this president so desperately wants a bad deal is he going to let iran walk all over him. whack the media say they manufactured a debate about a manufactured subject whether the u.s.a. should have invaded iraq in 2003 based on what we know in 2015 about a course of events you are really giving it to the media. well, greta. here s my point. look instead of worrying about happened 12 years ago worry about the danger that iran presents today. the reality is under george w. bush, our friends trust us and enemies feared us. that s not true under president obama. he learned the wrong lessons from 2003
demonizing the organizers of the event instead of recognizing that the jihadis are here. they will continue to petroleum mull gate not just in iraq or afghanistan or in the middle east. this is going to spread into all of our countries all across western civilization. if we are not willing to stand up and realize this is a situational battle, this is ideological battle and confront them and meet them, then it is going to continue to infect and invade us here in the united states of america. as well as you have seen the attacks in paris and england and belgium all across western civilization. so this is why this is not just something that is contained into the middle east. this is a global jihadist movement and we have to see it this way. this is a world war 4. i call it world war 4 because the cold war was world war iii. colonel, thank you sir. thank you greta. this is a fox news alert.