saturday the 6th of may. that is such a long time for you to be detained is yes, it was. . i such a long time for you to be detained is yes, it was. . lam such a long time for you to be detained is yes, it was. . i am a bit speechless, actually, having heard that account of what happened to you. and your colleagues. well, thank you both for setting out so clearly what happened. that is very helpful to the committee. we are going to have some questions. so, lee anderson? going to have some questions. so, lee anderson? thank you, chair. my cuestion lee anderson? thank you, chair. my question is lee anderson? thank you, chair. my question is for lee anderson? thank you, chair. my question is for graham. lee anderson? thank you, chair. my question is for graham. thank - lee anderson? thank you, chair. my question is for graham. thank you i question is for graham. thank you for coming, graham, today. after your arrest, and the time spent in the cells, my inbox sort of explod
the public order act that you disagree with, that you dispute, that you think is not needed in response to the concerns of the constituents i represent and all my colleagues. if constituents i represent and all my collea . ues. , constituents i represent and all my colleauues. , ., ., constituents i represent and all my colleagues colleagues. if there is a law that allows peeple colleagues. if there is a law that allows people to colleagues. if there is a law that allows people to be colleagues. if there is a law that allows people to be rounded - colleagues. if there is a law that allows people to be rounded up| allows people to be rounded up without allows people to be rounded up without evidence and detained for low without evidence and detained for 16. ., , without evidence and detained for 16. ., a: :m without evidence and detained for 16. ., , ::::f . ., 16. .. that is 10096 incorrect what ou 16. .. that is 100% incorrect what ou ust 16. .. that is 100% incorrect what
To avoid unnecessary legal action, you need to respond to a cease and desist letter and formulate a strategic response that reflects the relevant facts and the relevant law. A cease and desist letter can come from a variety of sources, and they can contain a variety of demands.
workers can be defeated in this dispute, then so can. workers can be defeated in this dispute, then so can. . .- workers can be defeated in this dispute, then so can. sorry, if ou dispute, then so can. sorry, if you don t dispute, then so can. sorry, if you don t mind, dispute, then so can. sorry, if you don t mind, what dispute, then so can. sorry, if you don t mind, what you i dispute, then so can. sorry, if you don t mind, what you were | dispute, then so can. sorry, if- you don t mind, what you were saying you don t mind, what you were saying in terms of the different in scotland and in england, in the approach to the strikes with the railway workers and the fact that there is not a very different pay off on the table, but there is a different approach. i off on the table, but there is a different approach. off on the table, but there is a different approach. i think that s ri . ht, different approach. i think that s riaht, and different approach. i think that s right. and th
decent pay rise they deserve we want to pay. decent pay rise they deserve we want to -a . ., . . decent pay rise they deserve we want toa. ., . to pay. how much say has the government to pay. how much say has the government has to pay. how much say has the government has it to pay. how much say has the government has it these i government has it these negotiations? government has it these ne . otiations? ., ., government has it these neuotiations? ., ., ., negotiations? the government are a red herring- negotiations? the government are a red herring. yesterday negotiations? the government are a red herring. yesterday the negotiations? the government are a red herring. yesterday the rmt i negotiations? the government are a| red herring. yesterday the rmt were helpfully clear. they reject the principles of reform. that is not a political issue, it is an industrial relations issue. i think it is a smoke screen to say political involvement is a factor in the dispute. it invol