case is about. laura: well a blatantly false a blatantly false statement. here s the onl y thingin ifn lawyers need to know about this case.ft if after the twenterytion twenty election, donald trump had announced that he was retiring from politics,indict alvin would not have indicted him.ed or let s say if after 2020, trump had gradually evolved ind his views and maybe became more like romney or one of the bushes in that case,ve ind alvin bragg would not haveic indicted him. the real reason that donald trump was bookedngerprin and fingerprinted today comes down to one simple fact. wrong he has the wrongs political views. now to the entire class of politicians and media figures who cheered the proceedings today. donaldding trump represents an existential threat, a threat to the regim thee that s run our country into the ground fort decades, a threat to the credibilit tibility y the mediae calls out relentlessly. but most significant of all,um another trump term is a threata
type of things that benefit youatios for obligations you might have mi run forexampldidn t y office. and let me usee one more exampe here. suppose your busines as person,s you get these lawsuits filed against you, you say i m goingyy to run for congress. yoou sayu go to your corporate attorney , you say, i want g these lawsuits settled. he says, no, they re bogus. we shoulwant td go with him. and he says, no, no, i want to settle. so they re not a campaign issue. right. yo sayu can t pay for that with campaign funds. it s still a business expense. settled sot the purpose is to influence your election. so that s the importantsue. difference. all right, brad , you made it all clear . i don t know how that couldcampf be . and i don unds.t blame you for e really knowing how to refer to alvin bragg after this performance.al to refer to alvin bragg after thitoday. so y, so you re totally excuse brad . kind of a prosecutor, harvardcuo law grad. oh, all the digs ar t harvard.hd i don t knowi