death penalty. i have to describe dzhokhar tsarnaev who is sitting in that court. his hair is longer. it is significantly more disheveled. his beard is longer. his family had testified earlier in the week. he seemed to have a connection with them. he looked tearfully at them. there s been a string of characters vouching for what an incredible person he was before this crime took place. and whether they were able to reach him because he s shown so little emotion or whether he was able to connect in a way he now realizes it s done, it s out, it s over, whatever he gets, whether it be the death penalty or life in prison. it s very interesting to watch his demeanor. because he just doesn t care. well, he may not care but he s about to care because his life is about to change radically for the worst. deb feyerick, thank you for that. i want to take a legal view now. defense attorney joey jackson and cnn analyst dan yny sevelas.
agreeing with the aclu who filed this claim and have been trying to shut down the data collection by the nsa in the lower courts. there s just one more thing here too. it s just a few weeks now before congress even decides to keep that part of the patriot act alive. if it seems confusing, i know the perfect person who makes it real simple, his name is paul callan and he s a legal analyst. so if i get it straight, the patriot act to the nsa said, you re good to go, we have the law and the language. go ahead, collect the metadata on people s cell phone calls that you need in your effort to fight bad guys who want to kill us. all of a sudden, an appeals court has said not so fast, not so fast at all. not so fast at all is right, it s a fascinating decision, because it s about 76 pages in length analyzing privacy rights of american citizens, the need for national security. a nod to edward snowden in the