our climb will be steep. we may not get there in steep one year. we mayor even in one term.a, i e but america, i have never been more hopeful than i am tonight that we will get there. e. well, 15 years later, his party has gone from hope. nope, again, nope. they don t want biden the deterioration of our economy. well, we ve talked about this ad nauseam. abou obvious, but so is his own physical deterioration. ffect nauseanow, let s compare m fteen years ago to now. these are extraordinary times. this is an extraordinary election. the american people are ready. i am ready for rock is ready. this is his time. this is our time.. tiis is america s time. out. raq an iraq and irad n are iraq and iran. but iraq, not iran. it s really very, very dull when after all these years in public life, known for in two things ray ban sunglasses, the chocolate chip ice. wow.chip no iw undecer 51% of his own vos do not want him to run again. according to that new nbc agaiey that just came
the intelligence community was that this was not russian disinformation, but they all went with it anyway. laura , remember, this was just two weeks before the presidential election. they just had to mislead the american people and keep this false narrative alive for two weeks to pull offsition the election interference that they were clearly engaged in. community was not in the casehi of mike morell, he tried is t inull off 2016. the former actinelection g cia director did an op ed in the new york times callingnew yk donald trump an unwitting agent of vladimir putin and fanningfl the flames of the steele dossier. and the russia hoax. one point. oh, he wasn t successful there. he got together with anthonyger blinke wn on russia hoke s 2.0 n 2020. so the question, you know, and in the case of secretary ofa state anthony blinken, it s not just that he was trying to heltp joe biden when he was trying to hurt trump, but in the process, he framed
all the way back before. 2016 to twenty fifteen. the first person to enterese politics and talk about these things in decades was donald trump and that and that alone is what propelled donald trump to the front runner of the republican party and then and then allowed him to beat hillary clinton and steal all those voters from the democrat party. was it? he was singularly focused on this issue, working americans who just want to take care of themselves and their families and who have been pavastated by these policies, devastated by this globalism and devastated by byowed him ilo immigration, not to mention wo thised by or this government funde d servitude that the government is starting haiss begun. you know, donald trump was the first person to come along and talk about those thingsdonau and the problems still exist.mpa the we still neend td a fighter who s willing to fight this fight. steve and charlie, i like fighting the trenches with you
credibility and i believe them. how do you believe donald trump i m going to let the people of alabama make a decision. i feel like my record speaks for itself and i don t have to have the president or anyone else talk about it or try to label it. what do you think of the line that he s walking? i think trump was trying to thread a needle. saying, he said he didn t do it and it is 40 years ago. on the other hand, we should believe women. it s great. and it is all getting exposed. and they re trump voters. he is trying to muddy the waters. i don t think he is trying to say that roy moore didn t do it or did it. it is all a mess. and therefore, you can vote for moore if you want to. isn t that with this situation, a rather extreme political permission structure? i think it is unconscionable.
court s ruling. it demonstrates for purely political purposes, to scapegoat communities across the united states, to speak out without any concern for public safety. the trump administration was engaged in a partisan political stunt that was certainly not based on the rule of law. do you think you would have been less likely to score this victory if donald trump had been more careful in his public remarks and less rushed in pushing out that first executive order? that is certainly a possibility. as you alluded to in the introduction, the court s order made very clear and the judge highlighted the language of both the president and the attorney general. revealing what the true purpose was behind the order and its attempt on coerce cities into