whatever, when we don t have the ball. this is the greatest game ever when we have the ball. but he has also said phony scandal. now, i think this is at least more euphemistic. who kicked off the political football when they brought the parents to the rose garden? that was them. you think they brought bergdahl s parents in, you were wrong. they were there for memorial day. they were in washington. they said hey does that mean i can drop by too? juan, you said the military has no trouble handling these guys about the five they released. nobody is debating that. why do they have to handle these guys again and capture them
and country before. this is me, it s not about an individual, it s not about one man. clearly a bid to sort of salvage the republican brand or give them another hope, an alternative to romney. the other thing he talked about was redemption, over and over again. which is interesting as he s endorsing newt gingrich, a man with a checkered past, i think, would be the most euphemistic way to put that. i m sure the average south carolina voter would love to know that rick perry forgives newt gingrich for cheating on his first wife with his second wife and cheating on his second wife with his third wife. i m not sure that will help anything. but it s interesting to me, we talk about the very limited support that rick perry had in south carolina, probably going to get 3, 4%. so i don t think the significance of this move is maybe the 3%, 4% goes to newt gingrich now. the significance is those santorum voters. because that s the strategy for newt gingrich here. to be the consensus, conservat
so the when you contrast the republicans coming off like they are fighting an extension of payroll tax cuts which impacts the middle class and you have a president out there like this, this does not look like a sound political strategy to me on the other side. i think that s being euphemistic, reverend. you know, as richard said, it s a great strategy, incredibly consistent, white house. this is something the idea of americans getting a fair shake is something he s been talking about since 2007. i mean, he should be given some credit. this is not a johnny come lately thing. something he s cared about. i think he s lost the thread a bit in the intervening years and picked it back up again. the republicans have played into his hands and, you know, the center for american progress has a great piece of writing about this. obama has to adapt donopt a pin strategy, the younger base and 65 and older. they want it know social
but let me clarify. death panels, they are like the dog pound. and his euphemistic how much we are willing to spend for extreme care is something where rover was sent to a farm, except the dog is old people. and second, didn t sarah palin get hammered pointing out what they have been advocating meaning it is rationing. she just dumped the fancy rhetoric. palin ras right. palin was right. and if you disagree with me, you are a racist, homophobic crugophobe. let s go around the horn. jed, jeddidiah, i can t call you jed, it is wrong. yes. they want heavy taxes. they want healthcare rationing, and that s the way
mean death panels. but let me clarify. death panels, they are like the dog pound. and his euphemistic how much we are willing to spend for extreme care is something where rover was sent to a farm, except the dog is old people. and second, didn t sarah palin get hammered pointing out what they have been advocating meaning it is rationing. she just dumped the fancy rhetoric. palin ras right. palin was right. and if you disagree with me, you are a racist, homophobic crugophobe. let s go around the horn. jed, jeddidiah, i can t call you jed, it is wrong. yes. they want heavy taxes. they want healthcare rationing, and that s the way