A National Rifle Association affiliate has challenged the constitutionality of two new Maryland laws that restrict the public carrying of firearms, saying lawmakers can't simply replace "one blatantly unconstitutional licensing regime with another" in light of the U.S. Supreme Court's Bruen decision expanding the rights of gun owners.
A Pennsylvania federal judge has excluded proposed expert testimony stating that an infant's birth injury stemming from a lack of oxygen caused his autism, saying the opinion submitted by a family's medical expert was not based on reliable scientific principles.
A Georgia appellate panel on Monday reinstated a suit accusing a nurse practitioner of failing to diagnose a car crash patient's stroke, saying the plaintiff's medical expert, a registered nurse, was qualified to testify because the two job titles can be considered the same profession.
The California Supreme Court is set to hold oral arguments Tuesday to determine whether a person who contracted COVID-19 from a spouse can sue the spouse's employer, in a case over "take-home" liability that could have a major effect on employers in the Golden State and beyond.
After an attorney filed a motion asking a Florida state appellate panel if they and a trial judge were the "dumbest twats to adorn a bench" or "just dumb scumbags," the panel on Wednesday asked the attorney to explain why he shouldn't be sanctioned for violating court rules.