make the tv market less competitive and it will cost consumers more is there a perity merit to that argument? i am so, mobile about brian s problemhing between west world and his phone. how can he live in world where he can t keeprack of where he is? we love you, stelter. but toobin, is it going to mean that for consumers it will cost more? the argument, that was a core issue in the case and the sa as fars he could tell, no. that the opportunity of choices and the fact that it is still a competitive market means that time warner, under at&t, will not increas its , and one of the real big issues in the case was that the definition of what is a media company is really changing now. yoknow, was there a time when time warner, when we competed