axle distance of rule? soo and centreport really to be probably challenging city fauci was also pressed on comments he made that showed opposition to the vaccine was all ideological and the only way to go around it is by making it difficult on people like gardening their jobs. the sharpest attacks on the hundreds of millions of scientists at the national institute of health were paid during the pandemic and royalties from drug companies, and the data function research by the nih in wuhan that are most now believe led to the pandemic. fauci was on the defensive. in the accusation being circulated, i influences scientists to change their minds by driving them, and millions of dollars in grant money is actually false and is simply preposterous. trace: doctor fauci also denied he got rich during the pandemic is a he got zero royalties from drug companies.
mutation was intentionally inserted and why the committee wants more information from the department of health and human services. the gop wants to know why fauci would only state covid began naturally and not in a lab. you have dr. fauci, who knows gain-of-function research was going on in wuhan. but then he goes to push the narrative, even so far as to put down the lab leak theory, which we saw in an email. dr. collins telling dr. fauci saying we have to do more to put it down. he goes on the white house lawn and says it came from nature. robert f. kennedy junior appears before a another committee thursday on pandemic censorship. they have questions about overall censorship. well, i think there is plenty of scientists will tell you there was censorship. things got censored on social media, etc.
national security team appearing to confirm this reporting. take a listen. china is trying to improve their global reach and influence and again, their global intelligence collection capabilities, it s not like we are not aware of it, monitoring it, and not like we haven t taken steps. gillian: the state department is busy briefing reporters right now. we have not had a chance to turn the tape around for you, but i can tell you they just said it comes as no surprise what the president said, and should come as no surprise the white house has differences with beijing and this is all sort of just business as usual and to be expected. we ll try to get you that clip asap. sandra: gillian turner live at the state department, thank you. john: one of the first covid-19 patients was a researcher at a u.s.-funded lab in wuhan, china. we are also learning that part of that funding came from a national institute of health
every turn is pushback, hiding documents, so now we have intelligence that says yes, one of the scientists who was creating the super viruses in the lab, in wuhan, was the first guy t get sick. this is in november of 2019. most people think that a pandemic, the first person to get sick is about 13 weeks or so before the pandemic hits. so in january 2020 is when it starts exploding in wuhan, it s everywhere. all over town, not just the wet market, all over town. but in november, 8 to 10 weeks before that, they now think the very first infection was a guy that was actually handling and not only handling dangerous viruses but handling them in an unsafe manner. what i ve been asking china to do is work with us on this. they are not alone in this. there is some blame to go around. anthony fauci, nih, yes, they funded it and pushing it. they deserve some of the blame for the terrible judgment in this. but really it s not about blame,
the immune system and makes it hard to form antibodieans againt it. those kinds of research activities are typically not civilian use research activities, and solly not it ss it s quite remarkable that this virus would have propertie qs that are unusual, that look like they came from synthetic experimentnthetis and that leada such important bioweapon characteristics. well, right at this point, dr. kwei l. we see the you know, this this idea that, the kill rate would be so high and yet we were in part funding this research through these sub grants, through the ecohealth alliance. it looks lik ee money was used n wuhan. we don t know exactly how fungible it was. but the gain of function research that was being donega and now knows what a climate of fear and cleavage site is, that was part funded with u.s. tax dollars. it looks like if that is true.: how significant is that?