companies they will have to excoriate themselves and their own bad policies which created the environment for this to happen. go back not that far and you will see politicians trying to shoehorn people into houses which they could not afford. into loans which they could never pay back. they received money from the goldman sachs of the world. sean: government forced banks and financial lending institutions to do this why? under liberalism and redistribution every american had the right to a home whether they could afford it or not. it was a worthy social goal, but then wall street jumped onboard, cheap money, easy money, complete lack of regulation about what type of mortgages were put out there. wall street made money, paid off the politicians with major campaign contributions. you have the biggest remember fannie mae and freddie mac, really important point. they are not even in this bill. that s an outrage. sean: all these guys are
has the right to have its borders secure and live in the conditions of safety. unfortunately, the residents of my state in the southern part of the state any way, don t have that right. sean: senator, as were discussing earlier tonight, this will which obviously you support, has been compared to a form of terrorism, nazi germany, jim crow. people are calling for a boycott. i mentioned people calling for the burning of the city of phoenix for crying out loud. what is your reaction to people saying this? obviously there s been a misinterpretation of the bill. what is your reaction of what they are saying about it? well let me say, first of all, i talked to a group of law enforcement officials a couple of our sheriffs,
[ german accent ] sean: you are going back to the nazi analogy. that s not what this bill is. i think it is pompous and indignant of us to try to put any of our thoughts on to what arizona is going through. that s none of our business. if arizona wants to pass the law. i think they know what the problem is. sean: it requires the police to check with federal authorities on a person s immigration status if they top them for another reason. what s the problem that? can i speak frankly. as an italian-american i know about profiling. i know about prejudice. sean: as an irish-american. you guys beat us up, come on give me a break. i understand that when my grandparents came from italy they came here they learned the lange women. they learned the law the language. they learned the law of the land there was no problem with it.
companies they will have to excoriate themselves and their own bad policies which created the environment for this to happen. go back not that far and you will see politicians trying to shoehorn people into houses which they could not afford. into loans which they could never pay back. they received money from the goldman sachs of the world. sean: government forced banks and financial lending institutions to do this why? under liberalism and redistribution every american had the right to a home whether they could afford it or not. it was a worthy social goal, but then wall street jumped onboard, cheap money, easy money, complete lack of regulation about what type of mortgages were put out there. wall street made money, paid off the politicians with major campaign contributions. you have the biggest remember fannie mae and freddie mac, really important point. they are not even in this bill. that s an outrage.
you said do you have disagreement with this particular bill? i think i would be more careful in its language in some respects to make sure that it is not misinterpreted in any way. look, it is a reaction of the frustration that citizens feel. my understanding is 70% of the citizens of arizona support this. because they are frustrated, because their borders are broken. sean, you don t want to have citizens live where their property is violated, their homes are broken into. wildlife has been trashed. sean: for the benefit of time, the specifics in this bill the police cannot check status unless the person has been stopped for some other legal reason? the idea this could be about racial profiling is specifically addressed. do you agree with the premise that if somebody is pulled