trust has just announced that it failed to learn who is responsible for that unprecedented leak of the decision overturning roe v. wade last spring. that dropped opinion would ultimately be the opinion issued by the court in a highly polarizing decision to remove a constitutional right held for 50 years in america. from the new york times reporting on this developing story, quote, in a 20-page report, the court s martial said that investigators had conducted 126 formal interviews of employees all of whom had denied being the source of the leak. investigators found no forensic evidence by examining the court s computer devices and available call and text logs. the washington post adds, quote, justice samuel alito said that the leak was a grave betrayal of trust by somebody and it was a shock that led to a changed atmosphere at the court and made his colleagues in the majority, quote, targets for assassination. the threat to the justices, he added was not theoretical becaus
testify in the grand jury talk about it. some of the types of search warrants that can be used are things that are actually ordered not to be made public. i m not ready to say that the department wasn t looking at donald trump until cassidy hutchinson testified. that s reassuring. the entire mueller investigation was conceived of, staffed up, located in, conducted and then a report written hundreds and hundreds of pages in less than that passed since january 6. do you think that amount of work has happened and we don t know about it? i think that amount of work and more has happened. one of the big difference the mueller investigation was a huge investigation. it involved a lot of people and it involved an amazing amount of digital evidence as well as other evidence. it did, as you may recall there were indictments returned during the course of that
sidelined. the leaders have to have more humility, less absolutism, more answers like we don t know when that s the right answer and less paternalism. that s the only way we re going to rebuild trust in the medical profession. and in public health. then i think it begins with individual physicians o and researchers like you who act on conscience, speak with integrity, tellnea the truh regardless that will restore faith, at least mine. soestoai i appreciate your starg that by coming on here. thank you. dr. winnipeggers. t. appreciate it. so we going to another story that s been brewing tonight. so for weeks, as you know, the january 6th committee hass been holding hearings. they ve been widely covered on the other channels. we haven them. seen the news vae in them. but there is a bit of news toe emerge from that story and we want to get to it now.as so the new york times has ar written hundreds and hundreds of articles about january 6th since it happened, describing it as a riot and i
0 in the middle of summer, they have flexible plans to match my budget and go online to find the right plan for you. yeah, good girl. are you taking a statin drug to reduce cholesterol? it can also deplete your your ten levels. i recommend considering qnol chan along with your spatt medication brand. i trust is qnol. welcome to tucker carlson. tonight, nobody wants to talk about covid anymore and that s certainly understandable. this country lost so much in. two years. it s depressing to think about it and the instinct is just to move. nd but unfortunately we don t have that luxury and for two reasons. first, politicians are continuing to use the virus as a pretext to force their agendas on an unwilling and weary population that s happening still, believe it or not. and second, it may be more significantly long term. somebody has got to rescue science from the ideologuesak who all of a sudden have taken it over science must be objective. science must be honest. otherwise everything f