look at the law first. and then you have some tips for us. we just saw try talking it out. you bring your concerns. i hate it when i get call from a friend or client and they re having issues about retaining walls or about surveys or about dogs or about people wanting to assault each other. find a mediator. it doesn t have to be an official mediator. it s cheaper than hiring a lawyer. get a neutral party, a friend of both of you, someone that lives on the block. maybe the homeowners association can provide one. then you can actually put together a formal contract or agreement to say, listen, we re going to keep these hours in terms of music, in terms of parties, in terms of giving notice. the problem is once you enter into that contract, it s a binding contract and so then it can be the basis of lawsuits. but it s better than getting into an assault charge. file a written complaint with the landlord. then if you have to, file what s called a private nuisance suit.
the attack. my view you is the book is acknowledging there are two sides to every story and people come to problems with different perspectives and so i think it asks students to think openly. reporter: but bill nigen who says he is supports vigorous debate thinks the paragraph on palestinian terrorism cross the line. to ask whether a bombing that kills israeli children is a proper are response to so-called acts of war is absurd. i mean children are not legitimate targets in a war. reporter: while school officials had informal meetings with west they say they have yet to receive a formal written complaint. if that were to happen they would form a committee to conduct a thorough review of the book. in brentwood, tennessee, jonathan sed errie, fox news.
superintendent says it s intended to promote discussions and debate. listen. i think the critical question to answer is, does the book create an opportunity for students to engage in deep dialogue about important issues in the world. i think it does that in the context of geography. school officials are having informal meetings but yet to receive a formal written complaint. if that were to happen, would it prompt the school district to form a committee representing parents, teachers, administrators and curriculum experts to make a thorough review of the textbook. megyn: the store that sold high powered fireworks says it s its products is not powerful enough to cause the blasts. the best evidence has been seen by the millions of americans who watched the blast.
we begin with a developing story from afghanistan. at least two u.s. soldiers shot and killed inside the interior ministry in kabul. the taliban are claiming responsibility. they say this is retaliation for the burning of korans at a u.s. air base. anti-american protests over this incident have been intense, they have been deadly. four afghan civilians were killed today. now all military advisers for the international security forces are being pulled out now. we have the very latest on what we know. nic, what do we know? reporter: well, the most interesting thing is the gunman who is believed to be northwestern is still at large. these two american officers found in what we understand from an afghan senior policeman was a secure part of this government ministry. obviously deep concerns as to how the security breach happened and of course the taliban claiming responsibility. they do this reasonably often. sometimes they re right, sometimes they re just trying to get politica
standing near her like this, you re the same height as my wife. other things that might have been in the accusations i m not even aware of, i don t remember. after cain spoke, kraushaar s attorney spoke with msnbc s al sharpton. the incidents happened and my client stands by the written complaint that she filed. my client is planning on coming forward. we plan to contact the other women and try to have a joint press conference where the women will air their specific complaints. the attorney joel bennett specifically contradicted what herman cain had just said in his press conference. he said that there was not a settlement but an agreement. you re saying it was, in fact, a settlement which meant that her leaving and the payment was based on the accusation that was you and your client s understanding.