might something is learned from that, we might make slightly more sensible decisions might make slightly more sensible decisions. some countries in the future decisions. some countries in the future shouldn t be hosting events at this future shouldn t be hosting events at this level. | future shouldn t be hosting events at this level- at this level. i think it s england facin: at this level. i think it s england facing iran at this level. i think it s england facing iran and at this level. i think it s england facing iran and the at this level. i think it s england facing iran and the kick-off - at this level. i think it s england i facing iran and the kick-off match. facing iran and the kick off match. fascinating, absolutely. but this is about. the government does exactly the same thing. there has to be some sort of consistency. otherwise, it s just insulting. we will be. no doubt there will be so much we will discuss as the world cup progresses, but let s move on. let
boss it may be that he was simply demanding boss it also may be that he was simply demanding boss. it also was interesting why rishi boss. it also was interesting why rishi sunak, if he didn t know enough rishi sunak, if he didn t know enough about it, i thought it was a risk worth enough about it, i thought it was a risk worth taking or maybe he did it and he s risk worth taking or maybe he did it and he s finding out there s a lot more and he s finding out there s a lot more to pull together. he thought more to pull together. he thought- more to pull together. he thouuht, . ., ., , ,, ., thought. we have to stress, and thank you thought. we have to stress, and thank you for thought. we have to stress, and thank you for stressing - thought. we have to stress, and thank you for stressing that - thought. we have to stress, and thank you for stressing that in i thank you for stressing that in terms of the evidence, what we do and don t know, but the ministry of ju
and getting all the parts working. well, he wanted thejob. it and getting all the parts working. well, he wanted the job. it wasn t forced on him. it has to be pointed out that, as the ministry ofjustice said, there haven t been have been some complaints. i think it s worth pointing out that to get a story in the newspaper, you have to satisfy both your editors and lawyers and various other people that the story is worth running and watertight in that way. i lljust say one thing i worked in westminster for 12 years and i wasn t surprised by this. but we have to give dominic raab the benefit of the doubt. in terms of the pattern, it does look unfortunate. gavin williamson had to resign over all allegations over how he treated colleagues. it looks like the government has got itself a bit of a problem. let s not forget that when priti patel was home secretary, she was found to have believed staff
and nothing happened. i do think there s a wider issue here bleed staff. the flip side is they can take a robust questioning bullying staff. take a robust questioning bullying staff. take a robust questioning bullying staff. take a robust questioning bull in: staff. . ., , bullying staff. gavin williamson is strenuously bullying staff. gavin williamson is strenuously denying bullying staff. gavin williamson is strenuously denying these - strenuously denying these allegations. just to restate we saw when rishi sunak talk on took on the role, he talked about the professionalism that he wants to see within his government, and these kind of headlines, he s not going to want to see those. . . headlines, he s not going to want to see those. , . . ., , see those. he s a character himself. it ma be see those. he s a character himself. it may be that see those. he s a character himself. it may be that he s see those. he s a character himself. it may be that he s unde
ofthe been in the war so to speak in terms of the government and its internal fractions of the government and its internal fractions in of the government and its internal fractions in us. a lot of that was going fractions in us. a lot of that was going to fractions in us. a lot of that was going to come back with them, but that was going to come back with them, but that was the decision he took. he thought that was the decision he took. he thought he could get a more broadly based problem. i don t think you will be based problem. i don t think you will be happy with what happened he witi will be happy with what happened he will be will be happy with what happened he will be happy with what s happened with gavin williamson. that is in itsetf happened with gavin williamson. that is in itself difficult for the government. some people saw the writing government. some people saw the writing on government. some people saw the writing on the wall and shipped out, so