but i saw that kindness on the face of that doctor every time that he would talk to me. so the seed of inspiration comes from there, and it takes me to a point that sometimes going through really hard times in life, we can find our purpose as well. it takes us to really deep waters to evaluate what s really important. and for me, medicine happens to be the purpose of my future. yeah, i mean, of course we sit here, we know how successful you ve been, and in a sense that colours our conversation. but i am really trying to get inside the head, notjust of you, but of your parents. when you were a teenager back in afghanistan, of course, long after the soviets had finally left afghanistan, you were doing odd jobs, you were trying to make a living, but you still had this desire to study. and your father ultimately decided to sell pretty much all of his possessions to raise the money to send you to the united kingdom. that is an extraordinarily difficult, wrenching decision,
as far as we can see, this is the seven pages of the search warrant and the list of documents that were taken from the home. so what they re doing is officially unsealing it. we ve seen it a couple hours. we still don t have the affidavit. this judge action does not go down that road. that s a decision by the doj. as far as i can tell, we re not going to get the backup material to what we ve been reported on. in this document, it does over the seven pages, the three pages have the list of the documents that they left. but the related possible violations of the statutes are in here. they include the espionage act, a law prohibiting the deinstruction and concealing of document to obstruct an investigation and the unlawful removal of government materials. these all in the search warrant. what we need is the justification for the search
together. they re done in order of what he said. that last statement we cannot find a case that would support bringing criminal charges was toward the end of a 15-minute statement. i want to point that out. comparable situations, brett? they re very capable. they re the handling and mishandling of classified materials. it reminds me of when attorney general barr was asked in 2020 whether or not he would but suit obama or biden or hillary clinton based on russia collusion issues that came up and other issues. he said i m not going to make the department of justice political. he made the right call. comey may have been making the right call in terms of not pursuing a criminal case against hillary. but that has all changed. merrick garland has changed this. we knew he made the decision before he announced it. but it s very disappointing that we don t have the details and we
attempt to get a warrant against carter page. two of the four warrants that were sworn out against carter page were invalid. there s issues here with a department of justice and fbi that was out to get donald trump. having said that, do they have the goods on him this time? here s where i think doj has a wrenching decision to make. let s say everything we ve been reading is true and they have documents that were top secret or code word documents that donald trump shouldn t have had. are they going to indict him? or is the government going to say we got our documents back. that s all that this was about and we re not going to indict the president. if they don t indict him, none of their evidence or none of their suppositions are supposed to become public. if you don t indict, you don t talk. so now it s all leaks from an unfair department of justice and the hands of joe biden, his political opponent. so doj put themselves in this terrible position. i ll say one last thing here. if indee
think this was part of? well, it is a good point. i have also seen both sides when the department of justice decides to treat one as a national security case and another as criminal. and what is interesting is typically when you re dealing with a national security case, it s urgent and you don t have to jump through some of the hoops that you would need to on the criminal side and you can get to the documents and then you can later make a decision on the criminal side. here we don t have a clear perspective on what they are alleging the president has done wrong, whether it is an infraction surrounding his obligations on national security or is this criminal behavior. when you use a swat team-like response, you re typically revealing that you re treating it as a criminal case. martha: one of the many big questions that is not filled in here is what happened between