latter. i want to govern. i want republicans of all stripes. hold on. what do you mean when you say republicans of all stripes? i mean that all republicans don t have to agree on everything. we have common principles we agree on especially with regard to fiscal policy and national defense. but there s a lot of room for general disagreement. the whole rise of the tea party movement was a movement that said the traditional con servement movement wasn t doing its job. now you see within the republican party, the tea part faction, the mainstay republicans. the argument, we re going to lose this seat, voters don t seem to care. when you look at sort of the wrecklessness, because nate will do this analysis and i know you
if mistake was a defense against manslaughter charges, then the thousands of people we have around the country who are in jail serving time tonight for automobile accidents, that resulted in death wouldn t be there. every one of those was a mistake? no. many of those are duis or some kind of wrecklessness. that doesn t apply here. if you use your analogy, let s talk about a hospital setting, where a well intentioned surgeon causes an injury that takes the life of a patient. it was a mistake, they don t get charged with manslaughter. it s recognized as a medical error. nurses give the wrong medication. it takes a life. it s an error, it s negligence but it s not criminal. this is no different, this was a professional on duty, trying to render aide and made an error. it s clear, i don t think it s debatable. you did use the word negligence. that s in the oklahoma manslaughter statute, culpable
that s self-righteous. morgan, make your point. i agree with bill. actually i can t help but think of the european union and their bailout mess. greece accepted here excepted here, ireland and portugal, they were forced to put awe stairity plans in awe sterrity plans in place. the fact that states have to take this money and can t use it toward what they need to is only going to keep spending out of control. steve, if a state rejects the money and that money goes to another state, isn t that an encouragement for all states just to spend everything that comes their way? that s what s been feeding this gravy train for 40 years. you lose it or use it. it s there, let s grab it or somebody else will grab it. that s what rubio wants to stop. good thing. it encourages wrecklessness. we got to stop it. as for california, if it wants more tax money, lower taxes there, quentin. you have the highest in the country. you ll get money coming in