Candidate says, we have this problem. there are women who say i had an affair with them. can we just rustle up $150,000 of hush money that we route through a third-party, then reimburse and cover it all up? is that cool? what s your answer to that person? i hope i wouldn t run of the out room screaming, but there s a chance. so, you know, the problem is, trying to do something like that in a campaign context, where expenditures are supposed to be exposed, is clearly a problem. yes. you have to say to the candidate, you can t do that. correct, yes. the white house makes the argument, well, there was the case involving senator edwards, and he paid money. the jury didn t convict him. that s a pretty weak read here
Can we just rustle up $150,000 of hush money that we route through a third-party, then reimburse and cover it all up? is that cool? what s your answer to that person? i hope i wouldn t run of the out room screaming, but there s a chance. so, you know, the problem is, trying to do something like that in a expenditures are supposed to be exposed, is clearly a problem. yes. you have to say to the candidate, you can t do that. correct, yes. the white house makes the argument, well, there was the case involving senator edwards, and he paid money. the jury didn t convict him. that s a pretty weak read here because, first of all, the prosecutors charged senator edwards. there was a trial. the jury didn t convict him, but they were split on it.
What s your answer to that person? i hope i wouldn t run of the out room screaming, but there s a chance. so, you know, the problem is, trying to do something like that in a expenditures are supposed to be exposed, is clearly a problem. yes. you have to say to the candidate, you can t do that. correct, yes. the white house makes the argument, well, there was the case involving senator edwards, and he paid money. the jury didn t convict him. that s a pretty weak read here because, first of all, the prosecutors charged senator edwards. there was a trial. the jury didn t convict him, but they were split on it. the facts were really different. this all happened before the election had started in edwards case. it involved payments for a child he had had, when his wife was
You can see ta already in different countries with different type of organization structures. they re using technology that here in the united states we would never permit. china. surveillance. europe is gdpr. saying enough is enough. we ll make sure you can control your data. everybody needs to start to take position. we re looking at san francisco. you said you wouldn t run for mayor. if there s a ground swell of support. would you do that? the city is in need. i believe business is the greatest platform for change. and at the ceo of salesforce and it s evidenced by what happened with prop c. what we have done with the medical center. and the public school. what we ll do for the homeless. we can do far more here. than any politician can do. in a political office. i so strongly believe i m in the right job. san francisco. that we can see amidthe haze and smoke. what do you see san francisco in
we re looking at san francisco. you said you wouldn t run for mayor. if there s a ground swell of support. would you do that? the city is in need. i believe business is the greatest platform for change. and at the ceo of salesforce and it s evidenced by what happened with prop c. what we have done with the medical center. and the public school. what we ll do for the homeless. we can do far more here. than any politician can do. in a political office. i so strongly believe i m in the right job. san francisco. that we can see amidthe haze and smoke. what do you see san francisco in 20 years? i hope that we re a light unto the nation. this is a city that s an example of not only great technology progress. but great social progress as well. we have had that in the past. here s the home of the summer of love. here s the home of great companies we all know. wells fargo and gay rights. i hope we see other things. home of the internet.