fraud, they re both charged with it. but it s for manafort s bank fraud charges that continued up and through last year. you referenced those loans. let s put that on the screen so that we can digest. here you have april 2016 to january 2017 when mana ford worked on the trump campaign and gates on the transition. there are a couple of things to me that are worth mentioning. this is turning the screws on manafort perhaps more than gates. because there s no additional money that s going to gaelt thatthat e that that s to gates that is manafort s money. i wouldn t rule out the possibility that gates is cooperating. it may be a deal that didn t happen. it also may be a situation that they re going to play this out a
minute that the michael wolf book came out would have been enough. i wouldn t rule out steve bannon working his way back into donald trump s good graces, you re never fully out with donald trump. and the moment that trump needs steve bannon, although at the moment, i don t know what that would be he s going to come calling again. i think that though for the moment, steve bannon is going to do what the people around him have been encouraging him to do for weeks, which is to take a bit of a breather, slow down and reassess. because steve has made some unforced errors, not unlike the president he once served that have really jeopardized what was once a promising political career. jeremy peters, we re grateful to have you jump on the phone with us, and continue the scoop, and the line s open for another 45 minutes, if you get anymore
sloppy steve. once he gets to that point, it is clear he is really upset. i wouldn t rule out the possibly they start speak again, not certainly soon. there is a history with trump he re-connects with people he has broken. thank you for joining me. thank you. in the wake of the steele book and the president retweeting the button tweet, eugene robinson says, we ve made it safely through almost a 84, but at some point our luck will run out. what that means next.
here. i think the specific claims which are really silly, are less important than the sort of overall impression that s meant to be. he seemed to say that he has talked to the white house about the mueller investigation. the congressman said there was a plot to keep donald trump from the white house. and he wouldn t rule out the notion that james comey was part of that plot. your reaction? it s factually factually unsupported by the evidence. the polling data reflects that when comey both exonerated secretary clinton and then reopened the investigation, it was terrible for her campaign. as you asked him in the question, that would be one of the worst ways in which to sabotage the trump campaign by sabotaging the clinton campaign. so it doesn t make any sense. to jeffrey s point, i want to add that, yes, it s silly in
i think the specific claims, which are really silly, are less important than the sort of overall impression that s meant to be. i asked him if he was coordinating his message with the white house. he said he wasn t getting talking points, but he did seem to say that he has talked to the white house about the mueller investigation. the congressman said there was a plot to keep donald trump from the white house. and he wouldn t rule out the notion that james comey was part of that plot. your reaction? it s factually unsupported by the evidence. the polling data reflects that when comey both exonerated secretary clinton and then reopened the investigation, it was terrible for her campaign. as you asked him in the question, that would be one of the worst ways in which to sabotage the trump campaign by sabotaging the clinton campaign. so it doesn t make any sense. to jeffrey s point, i want to add one thing, which is, yes,