were overstated by a factor of three as weisselberg conceded in his testimony. he admitted this amounted to overstatement of give or take 200 million. he is saying these are exaggerations, lies, that would land most of the rest of us in jail. what is the status now based on what is public facing in the investigation? well, that exaggeration in itself wouldn t land you in jail, it is what you do with it after you make the exaggeration. you can have the biggest, best building, it can be worth 400 million. where you get into trouble is where you submit false information to financial institutions, banks, insurance companies, and then get a loan off it. that s where you can get into hot water. what s interesting about what happened this week, when i looked at all of the documents, very common defense in this situation is well, i relied on
trigger unintended renowned firearms expert aoc. and she snapped back with a bizarre accusation saying you remember congress, why are you limiting guns to people unsupervised who can t pass a basic background check question with the people you give guns to have likely abused their spouse or have a violent criminal record and you may not know it. why on earth would you do that? it takes your breath away, does it not? when crenshaw pointed out the utter idiocy of her statement, she just kept firing on twitter. domestic abusers can be master manipulators, plus domestic abuse is a huge indicator of gun violence. that is why vouching for a friend isn t a substitute for background checks. you wouldn t land a car to someone without a license to why lend a gun to someone without a
1900s. but harry truman very strongly thought it was a good idea. i think it s a good idea, because denmark is losing $700 million a year with it. it doesn t do them any good. all they had to do was say, no, we d rather not do that. or, we d rather not talk about it. don t say, what an absurd idea that is. excuse me. she s not talking to me. she s talking to the united states of america. you don t talk to the united states that way. at least under me. now, president obama, when they wouldn t land and land in the philippines, when they treated him so badly that so many place, the philippines is the one that comes to mind. that s different. they can treat him any way they want to. that s up to him. but they can t treat the united states with the statement, how absurd! reporter: sir, who are you accusing american jews of being
president. connolly went out early. reagan and bush were rivals. reagan won more primaries and got the nomination. bush seemed in line for the second slot on the ticket. it seemed for a time it might not happen. erg in the press was saying ford was going to be the pick. he called me up and said george, i want you to be my vice president. i answered the phone. there was a little tentativeness in the beginning on the part of governor reagan. things were initially cool and distant. he was suspicious of him. it was on the day that president reagan was shot. george bush wouldn t land the helicopter as he was coming back from texas. he put it only the president lands on the south lawn. george bush would not advance himself at the expense of the wounded president. george bush was as loyal and as sensitive to president reagan
president. connolly went out early. reagan and bush were rivals. reagan won more primaries and got the nomination. bush seemed in line for the second slot on the ticket. it seemed for a time it might not happen. erg in the press was saying ford was going to be the pick. he called me up and said george, i want you to be my vice president. i answered the phone. there was a little tentativeness in the beginning on the part of governor reagan. things were initially cool and distant. he was suspicious of him. it was on the day that president reagan was shot. george bush wouldn t land the helicopter as he was coming back from texas. he put it only the president lands on the south lawn. george bush would not advance himself at the expense of the wounded president. george bush was as loyal and