hillary clinton both supported arming the syrian rebels, the islamic rebels, against assad. i wouldn t have done that. they also supported toppling gadhafi and libya. so really the interesting thing is, is while obama gets blamed for not intervening enough, he s actually intervened quite a bit in the middle east. and i think not to our benefit. and so i wouldn t arm the rebels in syria. i wouldn t have toppled gadhafi. and we continue to sell arms to saudi arabia, which continues to be sort of an arsonist in that region, fanning the flames. you know, just yesterday executing a shiite cleric which i think is going to erupt into more problems in saudi arabia. so, i think my foreign policy is quite a bit different. i also don t believe in giving foreign aid to people who are enemies, and supplying weapons to the allies of al qaeda, as obama has. right. so really i m kind of the opposite. the interesting thing is the grahams and the mccains have been on the same side as obama, they jus
is that president obama and hillary clinton both supported arming the syrian rebels, the islamic rebels, against assad. i wouldn t have done that. they also supported toppling gadhafi and libya. so really the interesting thing is, is while obama gets blamed for not intervening enough, he s actually intervened quite a bit in the middle east. and i think not to our benefit. and so i wouldn t arm the rebels in syria. i wouldn t have toppled gadhafi. and we continue to sell arms to saudi arabia, which continues to be sort of an arsonist in that region, fanning the flames. you know, just yesterday executing a shiite cleric which i think is going to erupt into more problems in saudi arabia. so, i think my foreign policy is quite a bit different. i also don t believe in giving foreign aid to people who are enemies, and supplying weapons to the allies of al qaeda, as obama has. right. so really i m kind of the opposite. the interesting thing is the grahams and the mccains have been on the
foreign policy. they need to have that on the democrat side because it turns out probably the most likely candidate to take us back to war is hillary clinton because she supports regime change as a good concept. it s interesting, senator, when i read what you say about isis and your strategy to take on isis and i hear president obama say what he says about isis, i don t see a lot of daylight between the two of you. where am i wrong? actually the difference is that president obama and hillary clinton both supported arming the syrian rebels, the islamic rebels against assad. i wouldn t have done that. they also supported toppling gadhafi in libya. the interesting thing is while obama gets blamed for not intervening enough, he s intervened quite a bit in the middle east and i think not to our benefit, and so i wouldn t arm the rebels in syria. i wouldn t have toppled gadhafi, and we continue to sell arms to saudi arabia which continues to be sort of an arsonist in that region fanning