and that means, beefing up our ability to defend against nuclear attacks. increasing our defense for ships and other military capabilities in that region. so we have to go into this clear eyed, but also understand this other battlefield of world public opinion. which is one of the things the president has his eye on. chris: the new york times reports the present has asked the pentagon for options on eliminating but reducing the 28,000 troops that are in south korea. while the u.s. denies that as part of any negotiation as part of a summit, if you were to get a peace deal between the two careers, wouldn t a reduction in troops naturally follow? at the end of the day, maybe. and the president may be dangling a carrot out there to entice the north koreans.
worst. and that means, beefing up our ability to defend against nuclear attacks. increasing our defense for ships and other military capabilities in that region. so we have to go into this clear eyed, but also understand this other battlefield of world public opinion. which is one of the things the president has his eye on. chris: the new york times reports the present has asked the pentagon for options on eliminating but reducing the 28,000 troops that are in south korea. while the u.s. denies that as part of any negotiation as part of a summit, if you were to get a peace deal between the two careers, wouldn t a reduction in troops naturally follow? at the end of the day, maybe. and the president may be dangling a carrot out there to entice the north koreans.
and that means, beefing up our ability to defend against nuclear attacks. increasing our defense for ships and other military capabilities in that region. so we have to go into this clear eyed, but also understand this other battlefield of world public opinion. which is one of the things the president has his eye on. chris: the new york times reports the present has asked the pentagon for options on eliminating but reducing the 28,000 troops that are in south korea. while the u.s. denies that as part of any negotiation as part of a summit, if you were to get a peace deal between the two careers, wouldn t a reduction in troops naturally follow? at the end of the day, maybe. and the president may be dangling a carrot out there to entice the north koreans.
profile that immediately, it s going to have people wondering, why so concerned, mr. president? so clint, obviously, if you re a prosecutor, you re going to want to get as much of this material and have use of as much of this material as possible. i m wondering, though, wouldn t a judge be looking at this and looking at over piece of every file, every paragraph, every word as skeptically as possible? because it is. it is, again, not extraordinary, but unusual. it appears that veil of an attorney/client privilege. yeah, it s really extraordinary, in my opinion. you re talking about four levels. you re talking about going from mueller to rosenstein. rosenstein to the southern district, southern district to a judge. four people said, we need to move forward on this. that s pretty damning, i think, in terms of this investigation. the other part of it, which has
targeted by obama s irs. what is he trying to confirm? is he waiting on a confession? it doesn t make any sense. it s going to take a lot more time. in the meantime robert mueller is running all over the place. they won t even narrow his scope. neither you or i or any of the viewers of tonight s program could get away with deleting 30,000 emails after receiving a subpoena and still be walking around. katie: david, you agree it should be investigated for another reason. but doesn t the fbi have a credibility problem with the country as a whole and wouldn t a special prosecutor clean some of that up? i think what your audience would wants is for to us follow the rule of law whether democrat or republican to make sure these investigations go forward properly and there are impartial