professional golfer and this is l record. first and foremost i m a l professional golfer and this is just an opportunity to play golf on the world stage, and if i was playing on the pga tour, so my response that is just, here to play golf and enjoy and have a good time and try to grow the game across the world. well the american based pga tour, have said playing in this series, could see golfers ruled out of future events, and the ryder cup. most of the golfers have been grilled about their participation, accused of taking money, over morals. have a look at this exchange between, the mirror s neil mc leman, and british golfers ian poulter and lee westwood, who are taking part. if vladimir putin had a tournament, would you play it? i’m if vladimir putin had a tournament, would you play it? would you play it? i m not gonna comment on would you play it? i m not gonna comment on speculation. - would you play it? i m not gonna comment on speculation. in - would you play it? i m not gon
boycott. he s he s doing a boycott of me. he has a boycott with his operation. it s weird. it s weird. and especially since there is one person missing from this. this guy, his employer don t know the connections yetet here but move on.org? it s weird. george sorros. it s very grass roots. isn t it? freedom of speech. why? why was it pult into the bill of rights? why? how important sit? what does it mean? what is protected? what is not? gang, your neighbors need to understand that the free ride that our grandparents left us is over. they did all of the hard work. we really feasted on its carcass for a long time.
is right. standing up for what he thinks is best for his patients. don t we tell our children to stand up? why is our government teaching people too sit down and shut up? congress finds they may want the guy s license strip wai.d not only is this a reason freedom of speech exists we re about to lose to it allow people to speak up against the government wout fear of things like losing your business. losing your life and liberty. i mean, isn t this what got us here in the first place? i mean freedom of speech was freedom for for religion. not freedom from religion. freedom of religion. and it became political speech because religious speech in england was political speech because, let me see if i can get jim wallace to understand this, because they merged the two. being able to disagree