been speaking openly about the fact that their organizing committees have told them to take burner devices and be careful about what they do in china. china is a very heavily surveilled country. they re using an internet that is very, very controlled, even if certain restrictions have been lifted for foreigners while they re in beijing for the olympics. and so there is always going to be that concern. i think from athlete s perspective, they may be too worried, because they might think, you know, am i really a target for beijing. am i am i doing anything that is worth surveilling by the chinese state. i think the concern may be is more for, especially for journalists going into the games and, you know, for the limited number of government officials that are going in, as well. well, human lirights activis have been calling for athletes to speak out about human rights. it will be interesting to see whether they do and if they do, whether they will be heard. listen, thank you, james g
there were ties worth surveilling here. three of the surveilled advisers ended up pleading guilty. for these new remarks from barr which are news worthy are his embrace in rhetoric and related actions. of the doj reviews to investigate the mueller investigators. take a look. first step is find out what happened. i have been trying to get answers to questions. i found that a lot of the answers have been inadequate. i have also found that some of the explanations i have gotten don t hang together. in a sense, i have more questions today than i did when i first start. we should be worried about whether government officials abused their power and put their thumb on the scale. so i m not saying it happened. but i m saying that we have to look at that. barr is echoing trump there questioning if the fbi has its thumb on the scale. it was trump s own appointee who
or pretty big concern at the very least. on top of that, carter page has said on cnn that it was he was a formal advisor to the kremlin. i m not sure how many more layers of evidence we need. i do think it s important to pull back here for a second. the entire koucounterattack is based on the idea because the dossier came from somebody who was trying to discredit trump, the entire investigation is discredited. when you think about how thin a read that is, right, it s so the dossier is one piece of evidence that went to an applicable for probable cause this guy might be worth surveilling, that s it. and it s actually well supported. but carter page wasn t surveilled until october. the investigation started in the spring. it started because another campaign foreign policy advisor was bragging to an australian diplomat about the russians having dirt on hillary clinton. this is not even if you want to pan the dossier, fine, but