capacity to project any kind of military force without american help. and they don t seem that interested in having a kind of larger world role. they re largely internally eu focused. is it a fool s errand to try to get the europeans to play a larger, more active, strategic role? no. as i just said, the french after the united states have the largest naval experience in the south pacific. if we were going to make a deal with australia and britain, yes, i understand that we had better technology, but we should have included the french in thinking about the south pacific as a strategic arena and the british, particularly now that they re not in the eu, do have military capabilities and, again, deep ties. we included the british so why wouldn t we also include the french? the french are also pushing hard for stronger european defense
Đại hội đồng AIPA - 42: Đẩy mạnh kỹ thuật số giải quyết các vấn đề xã hội, môi trường | Việt Nam và Thế giới
sggp.org.vn - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from sggp.org.vn Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
dependable, maybe now is the time to press, explore what we can get away with. this is clearly an america that s totally focused domestically and has little interest in maintaining a large world role or even a medium-size world role for much longer. it feeds a narrative and that s what concerns me. one other thing, beyond the humanitarian nightmare, we have pakistan next door, they ve provided a sanctuary to the taliban. but what s going to happen now is i think there s a decent chance that the taliban in afghanistan become a sanctuary to undermine pakistan. this doesn t stop here. i think this could become a real destabilizing platform in this part of the world. in pakistan there s dozens of