we have overcome, he joins us tonight. thanks very much for coming on. this whole approach, the tribal approach to journalism strikes me as inherently dishonest. if you have a different measure of one person based on the way that person looks come up with a person sleeps with, for another person, isn t that lying? it s not only lying, it s also putting your professional oath under professional obligation above truth and objectivity where you are saying that identity politics and tribalism supersede your obligations to tell the truth in your adherence to objectivity, which puts journalism and truth and objectivity at a dead end. and it backfired on her, as it should have. tucker: it seems like it s very common. the fact that you could admit this out loud, especially in journalism where you are standing in by proxy for your viewers or readers to ask
knows what voters want, do you thinkss that is a winning messa? a vote for us or we ll investigate you? it isn t the message that the house members who successfully captured control of that body ran on last fall. they talked about delivering for the american people on things like health care and other matters. they make a case on the economy on the extent that they can but they didn t run on endless investigations and they certainly didn t run on some of the other stuff they had been talking about, such as reparations. elizabeth warren and others who are running for president are now talking about reparations, she wants it extended to native americans. they are talking about all of the elements of the green new deal which is extraordinary. we are talking here about a program of actions that are not simply implausible or difficult, they are impossible! the these are things that can t happen that won t.