reporter: little debate on the timing. what happened this morning at 9:00 am, democrats in the house unveiled articles of impeachment. at 10:00 am their leader, nancy pelosi announced a major bipartisan compromise with donald trump allowing him to fulfill the campaign promise of rewriting the north american free trade agreement. confused? so are a lot of democrats. this is a day we have all been working to, infinitely better than what was initially proposed by the administration. pelosi says it is worth holding up 13 months to get concessions on enforcement for workers rights, environmental protection and stripping out intellectual property protections for prescription drugs. the white house republicans say she held up and after replacement with a political distraction. if you need evidence of how
the details. we ll get to the timing in a minute. what happened this morning. at 9:00 a.m., democrats in the house unveiled articles of impeachment. at 10:00 a.m., their leader, nancy pelosi, notes is a major bipartisan compromise of president trump, allowing him to fulfill his campaign promise of rewriting the north american free-trade agreement. confused? local, so are a lot of democrats. this is a day we have all been working to. it is better than what was initially proposed by the administration. pelosi says it was worth holding out for 13 months to get concessions on enforcement for workers rights, environmental protections, and stripping out intellectual property protections for prescription drugs. the white house and republicans say pelosi simply held up the nafta replacement as a political distraction. if you need any more evidence of how unpopular impeachment is, watch the two press conferences today. speak of agreement gives 30 when democrats are present in
it s a great point you make, though, following protocol or following trump protocol? according to previous administrations, this was not done. democrat, republican, go back through time. there was a system for handling these things that has been pretty consistent over time. but if you go back again, remember the anonymous essay of a year ago. the whistleblower tracked some of that, that you have white house staff essentially working to, quote, unquote, protect themselves or protect the president from themselves or protect the country from the president and so on, and having an extraordinary system of doing things. i think the reason why there is a secrecy around his calls is because they ve been embarrassed before with accounts of his calls being released to the public. but at the same time it doesn t explain why, in a situation like this in which the president wants to claim on the one hand the call was perfect, the white house would be trying to prevent him from embarrassment via
in and make the purchase. that was our theory, yes. it s hard to put together a heat of passion scenario, mom s in jeopardy, if you purchase the weapon in advance. correct. and the prosecutor told the jury there was no evidence of a fight that evening. if you look at the exact moment of the killing, jim tan is just sitting at his desk. sitting at his desk answering e-mails. answering e-mails, working to, you know, provide a living and a pretty good living for his family. in fact, the medical examiner testified that as jim tan sat behind his desk in his home office, he was shot three times about the chest and face. the last shot the coup de grace. medical examiners still believe jim tan was alive when that was inflicted right to his face. the prosecutors believe it was thursday night, that same night, the same night that one of charlie s friends sent a deputy to the tan home to check on charlie s welfare.
why is he turned down? why can t he buy the shotgun? he s a canadian citizen. which would require a waiting period, time he didn t have. so he gets the friend to come in and make the purchase. that was our theory, yes. it s hard to put together a heat of passion scenario, mom s in jeopardy, if you purchase the weapon in advance. correct. and the prosecutor told the jury there was no evidence of a fight that evening. if you look at the exact moment of the killing, jim tan is just sitting at his desk. sitting at his desk answering e-mails. answering e-mails, working to, you know, provide a living and a pretty good living for his family. in fact, the medical examiner testified that as jim tan sat behind his desk in his home office, he was shot three times about the chest and face. the last shot the coup de grace. medical examiners still believe jim tan was alive when that was inflicted right to his face.