Understand the implications, so much so that the inquiry was exasperated by the end of it. Also the issue of Remote Access and we are likely to have questioning about what she knew and when she knew it. Yesterday she said she missed a key e mail about this in 2010 and all of this started with an apology that many of the victims i spoke to were not particularly satisfied with. I spoke to one victim who was a Sub Postmistress and was accused of stealing but was eventually wrongly convicted of False Accounting and a listen. Studio i think we will listen to that now. ,. , studio i think we will listen to thatnow. ,. ,. , that now. Because she was already contradicting that now. Because she was already contradicting herself, that now. Because she was already contradicting herself, she that now. Because she was already contradicting herself, she said that now. Because she was already contradicting herself, she said one| contradicting herself, she said one thing contradicting herself, she s
The robbery. That was the assessment. The robbery. That was the assessment. I the robbery. That was the assessment. I wasnt the robbery. That was the | assessment. I wasnt sure the robbery. That was the assessment. I wasnt sure how the robbery. That was the assessment. I wasnt sure how much it was. ,. , it was. Initially, they found him entirely culpable it was. Initially, they found him entirely culpable for it was. Initially, they found him entirely culpable for the it was. Initially, they found him i entirely culpable for the robbery, for breaching procedures, and required for breaching procedures, and required him to repay £38,000. Some of the required him to repay £38,000. Some of the money, i should say, i think 515. 000 of the money, i should say, i think £15,000 had been recovered from the robbers £15,000 had been recovered from the robbers hy £15,000 had been recovered from the robbers by the police because of the Information Thatjulie Robbers by the police because of the